CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1011DEC005094199
11 octobre 2001
The court sent that decision to the applicant on 10 May 2000, but the applicant failed to collect it. The court sent it again on 4 June 2000 and the applicant received it on 29 June 2000.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0726JUD000346204
26 juillet 2007
    On 18 December 2001 the applicant sent the writ of execution to the Ministry of Finance. 11.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-127701
5 octobre 2013
    On 12 August 2008 the Senate of the Supreme Court refused the applicant’s appeal on points of law. 19.
cr
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2016:CR01415
15 mars 2016
passive d'une personne détenant un mandat électif, abus de biens sociaux, achats de vote, blanchiment, complicité et recel de ces délits ; qu'à la demande des juges d'instruction saisis, le Bureau du Sénat
CHAMBRE 2
DTA_2100399_20231205
5 décembre 2023
En premier lieu, d'une part, il ressort de l'article 2 de ses statuts que l'association CAMI Pau-Est a pour objet, dans les communes de Sendets, Andoins, Ousse, Artigueloutan, Idron, Lée et Soumoulou,
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1016DEC003106296
16 octobre 1996
  With effect of 1 September 1993 the Staff Senate (Personalsenat) of the Feldkirch Regional Court modified the distribution of cases (Geschäftsverteilung).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0610DEC000580105
10 juin 2008
The letter was sent by registered mail but without a request for receipt. It never arrived at the Court’s Registry.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0105DEC000596902
5 janvier 2006
According to the Government, notices of an appeal hearing on 25 July 2001 before the Kaliningrad Regional Court were sent on 13 July 2001 to the applicant, who received the notice on 20 July 2001, and
ECLI:CEDH:001-157469
1 septembre 2015
The case file was sent therefore to the prosecutor’s office in order to clarify all these aspects.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0416REP003060596
16 avril 1998
  On 24 July 1990 the latter declared its territorial incompetence and sent the case to the Milan Court.   13.
Pôle 4 - Chambre 9
6162678712fe6a3e85a6c851
28 novembre 2013
En 1980, la commune de [Localité 1] a décidé de fermer le chemin, autorisé sa division et sa vente aux riverains, M et Mme [C] [C] et M et Mme [A] pouvant dès lors acheter, chacun, la demi-sente jouxtant
Deliberation
HATVP:2021-103
6 juillet 2021
L’intéressé doit ainsi s’abstenir, jusqu’à l’expiration d’un délai de trois ans suivant la cessation de ses fonctions publiques, de toute démarche, y compris de repré sentation d’intérêts, auprès de
Tribunal Administratif de Montreuil
ORTA_2113406_20230901
1 septembre 2023
C A, représenté par Me Sene, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'exécuter l'ordonnance n°2102333 ; 2°) de mettre à la charge du préfet de la Seine-Saint-Denis la somme de 3 000 euros en application des dispositions
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1023DEC003547697
23 octobre 2001
On 7   March 2001 the Registrar sent a letter to the applicant, informing him of the state of the proceedings in his case.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1203DEC002606494
3 décembre 1997
  On 3 December 1996 a copy of these observations was sent to the applicant's representatives who were invited to submit, before 23 January 1997, their observations in reply.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0105DEC004295306
5 janvier 2010
In the period February 2002 – October 2003 the investigation was concluded three times and sent to the prosecutor who on each occasion remitted it with instructions for further investigation.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1124DEC001845309
24 novembre 2015
On 11 April 2012 the letter of the applicant was sent to the respondent Government for comments.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0826DEC001092606
26 août 2014
By letter dated 17   December 2013, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 12   August 2013 and that no
ECLI:CEDH:001-184677
19 juin 2018
The Zielona Góra Regional Court, apparently unaware of the fact that the applicant remained in detention in connection with another criminal case, sent a summons to the hearing to the applicant’s home
ECLI:CEDH:001-112029
19 juin 2012
Following a spree of the applicant’s complaints, on 19 June 2006 the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation quashed the conviction and sent the case for a new examination to the trial court.
Page 84 sur 1290