In May 2013 J.B. died without leaving a will. In accordance with domestic law, unmarried partners were not entitled to inherit their partner’s property in the absence of a will.

On 6 April 2018 the Government, relying on the relevant domestic documents, informed the Court that the applicant had died on 27   January   2018.

The applicant died in the course of proceedings before the Court.

Slav, had died on 8 March 2014. They further inquired whether there was another representative of the applicant who could lawfully pursue the proceedings before the Court.

By letter of 26 January 2016 the applicant’s representative informed the Registry that the applicant had died on 15   October 2014 and that the late applicant’s wife wished to continue the proceedings

Z. died. The proceedings were taken over by his wife, the applicant, as his heir.

He died in January 1994, after being released and admitted to a public hospital. Criminal proceedings were opened at the applicant’s request, but the case was closed by the military authorities.

It became known to the Court that the first applicant, who was also the representative of the second applicant organisation, had died in or around 2012.

On 12 April 2021 the Government made a request to restore the application to the Court’s list of cases, as during the enforcement of the Court’s decision they had learned that the applicant had died on

B. was released and on 7 November 1999 he died for unknown reason. On 2 March 2000 the investigator discontinued criminal proceedings against Mr. B. due to his death. 2.

On 19 November 2018 the Government informed the Registry that the applicants had died.

When their mother died, A. brought an action requesting the court to determine how the estate should be divided and seeking an order that the applicant, as the child of an adulterous relationship, could

By letter of 13 October 2012 the applicant’s representative informed the Court that the applicant had died on 23 March 2012 and that his heirs, Ms Vera Vulović, Ms Mira Filipović and Ms Katarina Mijailović

Effective investigation Alleged failure to carry out demining operations or to effective investigate death following explosion of antipersonnel device: inadmissible Facts – The applicants’ relative died

Thirdly, the applicant’s wife received a widow’s pension, which ensured that the family immediately received a pension based on the assumption that he had died rather than that he had been dismissed.

establish the responsibility of the administrative authorities for the death of a thirteen-year old boy in a public place: violation   Facts – In June 2005 the applicants’ thirteen-year old son died

FIRST SECTION Application no. 13015/20 Karima ZEMZAMI against Italy lodged on 2 March 2020 communicated on 17 November 2021 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant is the sister of Anas Zemzami, who died

The telephone call was answered by the applicant’s sister who informed the Court that the applicant’s father had died and the applicant was not at home at that moment.

On 13 April 2021 the Government made a request to restore the application to the Court’s list of cases, as during the enforcement of the Court’s decision, they had learned that the applicant had died on

He was suspected of causing a car accident in which four other passengers had died and fifteen had been injured. 4.