On 18 May 2007 the applicants participated in a gathering in commemoration of İbrahim Kaypakkaya, the leader of the TKP/ML (Turkish Communist Party-Marxist/Leninist), who had died in 1973, allegedly under

As a result of the fall, he sustained serious injuries of his head, shoulders and upper part of the body and died on the spot. B.

The applicant’s mother died on 1 May 1994. Subsequently, inheritance proceedings ( ostavinski postupak ) were opened before the Stari Grad Municipal Court ( Općinski sud u Starom Gradu ).

Even if he died of assisted suicide or euthanasia outside Hungary, the relevant provision of the Criminal Code would apply and anyone assisting him in ending his life could face criminal charges in Hungary

The Court notes that the applicant complained about the length of the civil proceedings instituted against her late father, who died while those proceedings were pending before the Constitutional Court

The applicant's wife died on 19 April 1998. On 14 June 2001 the applicant applied for widows' benefits. Some time later, the applicant was informed that his claim had been disallowed.

As the man sustained serious injuries, he was taken to hospital where he died few days after the incident.

This friend of ours died along with two other friends and is a martyr. They had the same demand [as the Kurdish people] and nothing else.

    In the course of the ensuing proceedings the applicants’ legal predecessors died and the applicants entered the proceedings in their stead. 4.

The applicant’s partner died on 7 January 2014. The applicant requested a survivor’s pension on 2 April 2014.

THE LAW The Court notes that in a number of cases in which an applicant died in the course of the proceedings, it has taken into account the statements of the applicant’s heirs or of close family members

Article 2 (killing) – While the circumstances in which the applicant’s son died and the fact that he was working for a pro-Kurdish newspaper militated in favour of the applicant’s allegations, the material

basis of remarks by former accountant of involvement in improper dealings with a company: no violation   Facts – The applicants are respectively the wife and daughter of a senior judge who has died

On 5 January 2022 the Government made a request to restore the application to the Court’s list of cases, as during the enforcement of the Court’s decision they had learned that the applicant had died on

From the developments set out above it appears that the applicant died in the course of the proceedings. No heirs or close relatives have expressed the wish to pursue the application on his behalf.

Greece (no. 41459/98)   Violation Article 6 §   1   Athina Fatourou, a Greek national (who died on 3 August 1998), complained, under Article 6 § 1, about the length of the administrative

The applicant’s wife died on 23 June 1999. On 13 November 2000 the applicant made a claim for Widow’s Bereavement Tax Allowance (“WBA”) to the Inland Revenue (“IR”).

On   18   February 2000 the post returned the mail sent by the Court’s Registry with the explanation that the applicant had died.

She died at 10:56 a.m.

On 29 March 2011 Mr Nedeljko Šalipurović informed the Court that Mr Božidar Šalipurović had died on 29   October 2010.