In the case of Svrtan v.

In the case of Ramda v.

  In the case of X and Others v.

must be carried out, relevant steps must be taken for the reimbursement of the damage caused, Ismayilov Novruz Binnat oglu must be charged with additional offences in connection with the above-mentioned

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.

In the case of Vergelskyy v.

    On 29 March 2004 the District Court refused to examine the applicant’s case on the merits.

Marc X..., dont le siège est ..., 6°/ de M.

On the applicant's initiative, his case was re-examined by the DLP on 27 March 1996, the DLP hearing the applicant and his counsel together with evidence from a psychologist and psychiatrist.

  In the case of Beker v.

Europe 92, société anonyme, dont le siège est ..., en cassation des arrêts rendus les 1er février 1999, 15 mars 1999 et 7 avril 1999 par la cour d'appel de Metz (chambre sociale), au profit : 1

Europe 92, société anonyme dont le siège est ..., en cassation des arrêts rendus les 1er février, 15 mars et 7 avril 1999 par la cour d'appel de Metz (Chambre sociale) , au profit : 1 / de M.

des difficultés financières liées à cette perte d'emploi" et "à la rupture de la carrière de" M.

He was ultimately found guilty in March 2003 and given a three-month suspended sentence. The case concerns the applicant’s complaint about the length of the criminal proceedings against him.

  The particular circumstances of the case       16.

  The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. The applicant was born in Nigeria on 11 June 1958.

(See Austin and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], 39692/09 , 40713/09 and 41008/09, 15   March 2012, Information Note   150; and Medvedyev and Others v.

may, in exceptional cases, request that the case be referred to the 17 ‑ member Grand Chamber of the Court.

The case file was transmitted to the court of appeal in March 2010. In July 2010 the applicants informed the Court that the due amount had not yet been paid to them. B.