CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

2 619 résultats pour « Isabel WERTER »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0605JUD003376105

Admin. suprême

5 juin 2014

5 juin 2014

    On 3   May 2005 the joined cases were submitted for trial before the District Court. 15 .     Hearings were held on 8 July and 21 July 2005.

Page 87 sur 131

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0407DEC007680001

Admin. suprême

7 avril 2009

7 avril 2009

The Czech Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr V.A. Schorm, from the Ministry of Justice. A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0216JUD007534501

Admin. suprême

16 février 2012

16 février 2012

grounds for initiating criminal proceedings were reclassified.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0718JUD005075706

Admin. suprême

18 juillet 2013

18 juillet 2013

    The women and children of the applicants’ family were made to stay outside in sub-zero temperatures, and were then allowed to go to a neighbour’s house, but only several hours later.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-230019

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 2023

6 décembre 2023

In particular, according to a specific resolution adopted in 2019, account holders were to receive back their funds if they amounted to less than 100,000 euros (EUR) without any loss of value.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1213JUD002268907

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 2012

13 décembre 2012

    At the material time expulsion measures were governed by Book V of the CESEDA, introduced by Law no. 2006-911 of 24 July 2006.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0801JUD003377408

Admin. suprême

1 août 2013

1 août 2013

Accordingly, the Court is satisfied that the required safeguards were put in place. 60.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0915JUD000473706

Admin. suprême

15 septembre 2011

15 septembre 2011

The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr   Y.   Zaytsev. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1210JUD004370707

Admin. suprême

10 décembre 2009

10 décembre 2009

In the majority of the ITTs visited by her, the detainees were provided with food only once a day. In the Sevastopol ITT there were 206 persons detained while there were only 82   places. 42.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0206JUD005017907

Admin. suprême

6 février 2014

6 février 2014

The restitution order and the rectifying decision were contrary to sections 13, 21 § 1 (1), 28 § 2, 33 and 36 of the Restitution Act (see paragraphs 31-38 below), and were accordingly legally unenforceable

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1020JUD001188210

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2015

20 octobre 2015

When leaving, they were asked to show their identity cards and their belongings were checked. 22.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0309DEC001794907

Admin. suprême

9 mars 2010

9 mars 2010

Statistics were submitted showing, inter alia, that in the period from 2001 to 2003, forty-four single adopters were approved in Denmark, and that in thirty-two cases paternity had not been established

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0120JUD000089105

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2011

20 janvier 2011

Whenever they were outside the cell, they were handcuffed, including for exercise which they took alone in a secure yard.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0124DEC001183807

Admin. suprême

24 janvier 2012

24 janvier 2012

They were represented before the Court by Mr M. de Stefano, a lawyer practising in Rome. The Italian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Co-Agent, Ms Paola Accardo. A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0716JUD000112605

Admin. suprême

16 juillet 2009

16 juillet 2009

    The Court therefore recognises that the proceedings were of a considerable complexity and that the social courts were faced with difficult legal and factual questions.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0506JUD000881207

Admin. suprême

6 mai 2010

6 mai 2010

    The applicants were represented by Ms S. Margaritova-Vuchkova, a lawyer practising in Sofia. The Bulgarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs M.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0617DEC000458205

Admin. suprême

17 juin 2008

17 juin 2008

Further decrees and statutes were enforced between 1952 and 1991.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1218JUD005731910

Admin. suprême

18 décembre 2012

18 décembre 2012

His age and poor health were additional factors making it unlikely that he would escape.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1218JUD002543506

Admin. suprême

18 décembre 2014

18 décembre 2014

No signs of any other illness or injury were evident at that time.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1115JUD004324507

Admin. suprême

15 novembre 2012

15 novembre 2012

The Swiss Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr F. Schürmann, of the Federal Ministry of Justice. 3.

Source officielle