CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3167919-3524879
15 juin 2010
However, there was no medical record to prove that surgery, as recommended by a doctor, had actually ever been carried out.
Page 87 sur 819
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-180997
25 janvier 2018
The circumstances of the case 2. The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 3.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0706DEC003772902
6 juillet 2010
In addition he had recently been cured of a long-lasting pneumonia which he had developed in March 2003.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0719JUD005961900
19 juillet 2007
The applicant arrived in Lithuania on 2 March 1998 with a transit visa valid until 4 March 1998.
ECLI:CEDH:001-113731
6 mai 2011
The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. A.
ECLI:CEDH:001-202604
17 avril 2020
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. Background to the case On 22 October 2011 the applicant married Ms Ye.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0122DEC001049811
22 janvier 2019
On 25 March 2010 the Supreme Military Administrative Court dismissed the applicant’s case. Subsequently, on 10 June 2010 the applicant’s rectification request was also rejected.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0624JUD007184813
24 juin 2021
In the case of Starenkyy and Others v.
ECLI:CEDH:001-175510
21 juin 2017
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 1. Background to the case 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0423JUD000317905
23 avril 2009
On 29 March 2004 the town prosecutor’s office informed the applicants that the investigation in case no. 26075 had been resumed. 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0314JUD001613308
14 mars 2013
In the case of Insanov v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0305JUD003916604
5 mars 2009
On 19 March 2004 the district prosecutor’s office again stayed the proceedings in case no. 24376 for failure to identify those responsible. 31.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0601JUD003050011
1 juin 2017
On 18 March 2010 the Gazakh Military Court overruled the investigator’s decision and remitted the case to the prosecuting authorities for fresh examination.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0424JUD001180185
24 avril 1990
the instant case and the Huvig case [] .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0317JUD002379610
17 mars 2016
In the case of Vasileva v.
cr
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2022:CR01084
14 septembre 2022
[Z] a formé un pourvoi en cassation contre le seul arrêt pénal et, par arrêt du 17 mars 2021, la Cour de cassation a cassé et annulé cette décision en toutes ses dispositions et renvoyé la cause et les
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0709JUD002037813
9 juillet 2015
In the case of Martzaklis and Others v.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0304REP001898491
4 mars 1994
settlement of the case.
ECLI:CEDH:003-1887196-1982012
9 janvier 2007
[1] Under Article 43 of the European Convention on Human Rights, within three months from the date of a Chamber judgment, any party to the case may, in exceptional cases, request that the case be
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6942
18 mai 2000
The regional investigator ordered a criminal investigation into the death and an autopsy was carried out, according to which death was caused by haemorrhaging due to trauma caused by a blunt object, which