CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

25 790 résultats pour « Senet »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0618DEC001417921

Admin. suprême

18 juin 2024

18 juin 2024

Nor had any evidence been provided showing that the application sent to the Court on 9   March 2021 was the same as that previously sent. 29.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1212DEC001624490

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 1991

12 décembre 1991

He also complained that the Governor read mail sent to the Visiting Committee.

Source officielle
TJ

Annexe Rue de Crosne

69d9638bcdc6046d47d00ea9

T. Judiciaire

9 avril 2026

9 avril 2026

Pôle des Contentieux de la Protection 22 Rue de Crosne 76037 ROUEN CEDEX 01 N° RG 25/01731 - N° Portalis DB2W-W-B7J-NLEG CADUCITÉ DU 09 AVRIL 2026 DANS L'AFFAIRE OPPOSANT : Mme [C] [X] 12, sente

Source officielle
CC

civ2

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2012:C201401

Cassation

12 juillet 2012

12 juillet 2012

par tacite reconduction, qu'elle est l'une des seules à pratiquer l'expertise en sa matière dans le nord du département du Lot, qu'elle est toujours aussi intéressée par cette fonction et qu'elle se sent

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1006DEC003159205

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2009

6 octobre 2009

By letter dated 29 October 2008, the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant’s representative, who was requested to submit any comments, together with any claims for just satisfaction, by

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1117DEC000440904

Admin. suprême

17 novembre 2009

17 novembre 2009

By a letter dated 11 May 2009 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant, who was requested to submit any observations, together with any claims for just satisfaction, in reply by 30 &#xa0

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1117DEC000961107

Admin. suprême

17 novembre 2009

17 novembre 2009

By a letter of 26 February 2009 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant, who was requested to submit any observations in reply by 9   April 2009, together with any claims for just

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0127DEC004405202

Admin. suprême

27 janvier 2009

27 janvier 2009

By letter dated 10 July 2008 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicants’ representative, who was requested to submit any observations together with any claims for just satisfaction in reply

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0825DEC004109105

Admin. suprême

25 août 2009

25 août 2009

THE LAW By letter dated 6 October 2008, the Government’s observations were sent to the applicants’ representative, who was requested to submit any comments, together with any claims for just satisfaction

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5460

Admin. suprême

28 février 2002

28 février 2002

A warrant for their arrest was issued and sent to the military police.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0322DEC004539604

Admin. suprême

22 mars 2011

22 mars 2011

By letters dated 16 August and 21 September 2010, sent by registered post and received by the applicant’s mother on, respectively, 19   August and 25   September 2010, the applicant was reminded

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0104DEC000038605

Admin. suprême

4 janvier 2012

4 janvier 2012

THE LAW By letter dated 20 April 2011 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant’s representative, who was requested to submit any observations together with any claims for just satisfaction

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0603DEC006143408

Admin. suprême

3 juin 2010

3 juin 2010

By letter dated 5 March 2010, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of the his observations had expired on 14 December 2009 and that no extension of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1208DEC002226305

Admin. suprême

8 décembre 2009

8 décembre 2009

On 24 March 2009 the Court sent a letter to the applicant organisation informing it that notice of the application had been given to the Government of Bulgaria and inviting it to indicate whether it would

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0126DEC001109607

Admin. suprême

26 janvier 2010

26 janvier 2010

By letter dated 16 February 2009 the Government's observations were sent to the applicant, who was requested to submit any observations together with any claims for just satisfaction in reply by 30 March

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0306DEC000270910

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2012

6 mars 2012

By a letter dated 11 August 2011, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 18 July 2011 and that no extension of time

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7416

Admin. suprême

5 février 2013

5 février 2013

The final domestic ruling in respect of his first request for such a permit was sent to him on 24   April 2012 and the regional-court judgment in respect of his second request on 5   April 2012

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0304DEC002589411

Admin. suprême

4 mars 2014

4 mars 2014

By letters dated 5 June and 18 September 2013, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of her observations had expired on 13 September 2012 and that no

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0401DEC004833506

Admin. suprême

1 avril 2014

1 avril 2014

By letter dated 16 February 2012 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicants’ representative, who was requested to submit any observations together with any claims for just satisfaction in

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1021DEC002469906

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2014

21 octobre 2014

A copy of that letter was sent to the deceased applicant’s address on 27 January 2012 for comment. By letter dated 12   February 2012 and following correspondence, Mr V.S.

Source officielle

Page 87 sur 1290

← PrécédentSuivant →