CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0517JUD006685012
17 mai 2016
It appears that the applicant had one hot shower per week and one hour of outdoor exercise per day. (b) Facts in dispute (i) The Government’s submissions 18.
Page 88 sur 105
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1107JUD003264409
7 novembre 2019
It was, then, necessary to quash its judgment and remit the case to the prosecuting authorities for them to draw up a proper indictment. 13.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0720JUD003395196
20 juillet 2000
As I didn't want the officers to go to my house, I decided to leave the police station ... The police officer ... caught up with me on the road and told me to return to the police station.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0331JUD005528710
31 mars 2016
In the early hours of 1 April 2006 a silver Vauxhall Vectra was set alight a short distance from the scene of the shooting. 6.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0112DEC002816015
12 janvier 2016
Many of the failings revealed by the cases which have come before the courts to date are simply incapable of being redressed at the drop of a hat or wig.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0717JUD002051103
17 juillet 2008
For the future, the County Administrative Board draws the hospital’s attention to the protection obligation and the duty to take care provided by the Personal Files Act, and further, to the need to ensure
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-117473
18 février 2013
2010 a three-judge panel of judges of Skopje Court of Appeal, presided by the sixth applicant, accepted an appeal by a defendant in those proceedings and replaced a detention order in custody with a house
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0917JUD001446411
17 septembre 2015
applicant’s written submissions of 17 December 1998 demonstrated that he was not willing to accept and implement politically legitimate decisions, if they concerned sanctions for misuse of property by house
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1209DEC005658013
9 décembre 2014
While the rest of the family stayed with relatives, the armed men came to search for information about the first applicant from their neighbours and at the house of the second applicant’s
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0930JUD006781010
30 septembre 2014
Furthermore, we draw attention to the pejorative nature of the majority’s finding.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:1027JUD001093084
27 octobre 1987
an agreement: the applicant and his brother were to sell the properties to the Municipality, which was to lease back to the applicant for a period of five years, with a possibility of prolongation, a house
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0311DEC006886401
11 mars 2004
The second applicant had been under no obligation to discharge her daughter's debts or to sell her house in order to pay the balancing cash adjustment restoring the gifts in issue to the estate.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1023JUD003351915
23 octobre 2025
The Court may draw such inferences as it deems appropriate where a party fails to participate effectively in the proceedings (Rule 44C of the Rules of Court).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0424JUD004528108
24 avril 2018
At the time of the events giving rise to the present application, he was the owner and editor-in-chief of a publishing house, Aram Basım ve Yayıncılık. 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0111DEC003221396
11 janvier 2001
The appeal failed and leave to appeal to the House of Lords was refused. B. Relevant domestic law and practice 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0611DEC000110613
11 juin 2024
On the basis of the resubmitted declaration, the applicant paid value-added tax of 1,356,454 Armenian drams (AMD) and customs duties of AMD 616,570. 12.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1024DEC003204096
24 octobre 2000
The Regional Court draws the mother's attention to her responsibility as the caring parent and charges her to take all measures necessary to get her daughter out of the present blockage.”
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0824JUD002361894
24 août 1998
Article 100-4 “The investigating judge or the senior detective acting on his instructions shall draw up a report on each of the interception and recording operations.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0113JUD000092605
13 janvier 2009
The president of the Assize Court draws the names of the jurors one by one. First the defendant, then the Principal Public Prosecutor, may challenge an equal number of jurors.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0523JUD001166285
23 mai 1991
In this respect, the applicant could not invoke a legal duty under Article 114 of the Criminal Code, namely to draw the public’s attention to the (allegedly) Nazi mentality of a high-ranking official of