Accordingly, following correspondence was sent to the applicant’s home address.

On 27 November 2015 the communication letter and the letter of 9   November 2015 were again sent to the applicant. No reply was received to the Registry’s letters.

By a letter dated 16 April 2012, the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant’s representative, who was requested to submit any claims for just satisfaction by 29 May 2012.

    The applicant has further sent three letters to the Court, the most recent one dated 3 December 2009. 5.

The Court’s correspondence concerning the communication of the case to the Government, sent to the applicant on 22 September 2015, was returned to the Court without being delivered.

By letter dated 27 October 2015, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 27 August 2015 and that no extension of time

Țigan, a detainee as well, the Registry sent that letter to Mr Tigan.

On 27 September 2019 the Registry sent a letter to the applicant requesting him to appoint a representative in the proceedings before the Court. No reply was received to this letter.

On 19 November 2019 the Registry sent a letter to the applicant requesting observations on the admissibility and merits of the application and of his claims for just satisfaction.

By letter dated 18 December 2019 and sent through the Court’s Electronic Communications Service (eComms) to the applicant’s lawyer, he was invited to submit observations in reply to those of the Government

By letter dated 23 May 2008 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicants, who were requested to submit any observations together with any claims for just satisfaction in reply by 4 July 2008

THE LAW By letter dated 7 May 2008 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant, who was requested to submit any observations together with any claims for just satisfaction in reply by 18 June

By letter dated 24 July 2009, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 3 March 2009 and that no extension of time had

On 8 September 2008 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant’s representative who was requested to submit any observations together with any claims for just satisfaction in reply by 21

By letter dated 2 May 2017, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 12 April 2017 and that no extension of time had

On 29 October and 30 November 2021, the Registry sent letters to the lawyer of the applicant’s widow requesting a copy of a document confirming that she was a legal heir of the deceased applicant.

On 31 March 2022 the Registry sent a letter to the applicant’s alleged heirs requesting a copy of an official document certifying that they were the applicant’s legal heirs and a duly signed authority

By letter dated 8 February 2022, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations   had expired on 2 September 2021 and that no extension

The Court’s letter sent by registered post in January 2024 to the applicant’s address returned as undelivered.

By letters of 28 April and 19 May 2022 the Government’s written observations in Albanian and English were sent to the applicant’s representative who was invited to submit by 9 June 2022 any written observations