The fifth applicant, Mr Artur Tomaszewski, was born in 1933. He is the son of Mr Szymon Tomaszewski, born in 1900.

The applicant’s reference to “cold cells” suggested that he had been held in one of the larger cells or the dormitory in early spring or winter.

    The applicant, Mr Artur Warsiński, is a Polish national who was born in 1976 and lives in Bytów. 5.

Greece (application no. 3271/08)* The applicant, Dimitrios Georginis-Gioginis, is a Greek national who was born in 1962 and is currently held in Chalkida Prison (Greece).

absence Amount awarded for non-pecuniary damage per applicant (in euros) [1] Amount awarded for costs and expenses per application (in euros) [2] 45049/14 11/06/2014 Vahe KHACHATRYAN 1979   Grigoryan Artur

Pologne (n° 12786/02) Le requérant, Artur Krowiak, est un ressortissant polonais né en 1970 et résidant à Cracovie (Pologne).   Soupçonné de tentative de meurtre, M.

Relying on the Law on Access to Public Information, as well as on the Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (“the Aarhus

    The trial court held its hearings from 26 November 2002 (the preparatory hearing) to 16 September 2009. 17 .

The armed forces were asked to help organise the implantation of the sites and the collection and transport of waste. 42.

He was represented by Michael Juul Eriksen, a lawyer practising in Aarhus. 4.

Her father, a Polish officer, was born in 1895 and was held at the Kozelsk camp after his arrest by Soviet troops.

discriminatory treatment compared with convicted prisoners as regards duration of short-term family visits and absence of long-term family visits     21945/21* 01/04/2021 Household   Artur

Poland (no. 12786/02) The applicant, Artur Krowiak, is a Polish national who was born in 1970 and lives in Kraków (Poland).

Fellow servicemen tried to help him but, when he did not regain consciousness, took him to the medical point of the military unit where it was decided to transfer him to the military hospital.

The Court held in Taron v.

In a judgment of 9   July 2009 the Court held that there had been a violation of Article   1 of Protocol No.

    The Court notes that by several final domestic decisions (see paragraphs   8, 12 and 13 above) the domestic courts consistently held that the scope of initial judgments had been confined

} .s1721E4C5 { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt }     THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 23101/20 Artur

The applicant again agreed to participate in an identification parade to be held on 15 May and was then released.

In the pedestrian street of Strøget in Copenhagen, the [applicant] begged from passers-by in that he made verbal contact with them and held out a cardboard cup and shook it.