The persons who had gathered there were surrounded by the police who filmed, verbally abused and threatened them.

They looted those floors and set the canteen in the Presidential Palace alight. During the night, several fires broke out in the Parliament building. The airing of the film about these events 9.

They then asked the applicants to come with them to the VOVD for a few hours to help them to deal with the paperwork.

They were successful at first and second instance but the Supreme Court quashed these decisions and remitted the case to the Regional Court, which then found that the first applicant’s husband was required

  They all have children. These requests for transfer had been refused by the Home Office.

Then they said that they would take the third applicant’s son with them so as to check his documents through a computer database.

They thrashed up an establishment, beat up a police officer, beat up the establishment’s owner, beat up the people who were there, and yet I know not of any of them having been arrested.

They allege that each time they wished to lodge asylum applications, but were denied that opportunity by the border guards, who refused them entry and removed them to Belarus, even though the applicants

Moreover, they claimed that the duration of the custody proceedings had been excessive and that, thereby, they had been alienated from their son. THE LAW 1.

The court examined both the statements they had made at the trial hearings and their pre-trial statements. 30.

They claimed that the furniture had been destroyed by the guards and the police officers who had arrested them. 19.

After passing through the initial security checks, they were informed that they would be strip-searched, as there was reason to believe that they were carrying drugs.

Then the applicants heard shooting at the house no. 28 and then at their own house.

  They were concerned about the statements which the applicants made, or which they allowed others to make on their behalf, which had the effect of influencing people to act favourably towards them

If they were then the law is that you may draw such inferences as appear proper from the defendants’ failure to mention these matters at the time.

They were then brought to the police station and kept there until release in the early hours of the next day, no depositions having been taken from them.

They added that if the fact of referring to Abdullah Öcalan in this way was an offence, then they accepted being judged and convicted for doing so.

Lastly, in each of these cases the applicants complained under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) of an infringement of their right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions.

They also questioned for how long the public care would continue, since that might jeopardise the connection between them and their children.

They also informed the commander that the applicant and his brother were acting suspiciously and that they had checked the area around the house with their torches and then turned them off.