Moreover, as in the case of P. v.

   As to whether there was a "contestation" within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 (art. 6-1), regard should be had to the principles enunciated in the Court’s case-law, summarised in the Benthem

    Particular circumstances of the case         On 23 May 1991 the European Court of Human Rights delivered its judgment in a case which had been introduced

  In the present case it seems, however, that the lower courts have also examined the substance of such a claim.

    The circumstances of the case 2.     The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 1.     The background of the case 3.

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE CRIMINELLE, en son audience publique tenue au Palais de Justice à PARIS, le vingt-sept juin deux mille un, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le

The merits of the case were not pleaded during the hearing. 18.

   Under Article 432 of the 1967 Judicial Code, which enshrines the case-law of the Court of Cassation on the subject (judgment of 15 January 1920, Pasicrisie 1920, I, p. 24), the Council draws

, but in the former cases the appeal committee has binding powers of decision.

    The circumstances of the case 3.     The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 4.

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE SOCIALE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par Mme Isabelle X..., demeurant ..., en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 15 juin 1999

Par arrêt en date du 16 octobre 2007, la Cour de Cassation a cassé cet arrêt, sauf en ce qu'il a déclaré irrecevable l'action de la société Sofigere, et renvoyé l'affaire devant la Cour de Paris.

, le présent arrêt sera transmis pour être transcrit en marge ou à la suite de l'arrêt partiellement cassé ; Ainsi fait et jugé par la Cour de cassation, deuxième chambre civile, et prononcé par le président

    The parties ask that the case be struck out of the list as of today.” 25.     The case was duly struck out of the list. 5.

This is not a case of telling the government how it must spend money.

  Despite the outcome of these cases, the Government submit, for the following reasons, that the question has to be answered in the negative in the present case.

Court H.R., Benthem judgment of 23 October 1985, Series A no. 97, p. 14, para. 32).

J-J BAZERQUE, 4 chemin Ramelet Moundi (31000) Toulouse ; Gérard BELLONI, 29 rue Gilbert Privat (24000) Périgueux ; Edouard BERISSET, 82 avenue Victor Sagoffin (31000) Toulouse ; Marc BEZOMBES, 3 rue Jean

knowing the entire case-file.