Article 35 § 1 of the Convention and the Court’s case-law (see, among many others, Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 46477/99, 7 June 2001) determine the starting

the Court in the present case (see documents DH-DD(2013)315 and DH-DD(2013)799);   Having noted, in respect of the individual measures, the authorities’ indications both that the applicant made clear

Turkey (dec.), no. 62566/00, ECHR 2002-II) or from the time when the applicant becomes aware, or should have become aware, of the ineffectiveness of the remedies (see Paul and Audrey Edwards v.

The Court notes that, in his judgment, the trial judge made it clear that he would disregard K’s evidence because of K’s failure to remain for cross-examination.

It was clear from the domestic courts’ remarks that whole life orders were imposed to meet the requirements of punishment and deterrence.

Where it is clear from the outset however that no effective remedy is available to the applicant, the period runs from the date of the acts or measures complained of, or from the date of knowledge of that

The Court has established clear and extensive case-law concerning complaints relating to the excessive length of civil and criminal proceedings and the lack of an effective remedy in this regard (see,

According to its established case-law, proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see, for example, Ananyev

concerned three applications originally lodged by ten French nationals, Mrs   Marie-Jeanne Chassagnou, Mr René Petit, Mrs Simone Lasgrezas, Mr Léon Dumont, Mr Pierre Galland, Mr André Galland, Mr Edouard

- signé par Anne-Laure MEANO, présidente de la chambre et par Edouard LAMBRY, Greffier, présent lors de la mise à disposition. *** EXPOSÉ DU LITIGE Selon bail d'habitation en date du 8 novembre

Considérant qu'il résulte de l'instruction les faits suivants : Aux termes d'un contrat en date du 1er janvier 1994 intitulé 'coopération logistique' la société ISA FRANCE avait confié à la société EDOUARD

failed to take measures within the scope of their powers which, judged reasonably, might have been expected to avoid that risk (see Keenan v. the United Kingdom , cited above, § 90, and Paul and Audrey Edwards

    The Court has established clear and extensive case-law concerning complaints relating to inadequate conditions of detention during transport (see Idalov v.

Ce magistrat a rendu compte des plaidoiries dans le délibéré de la Cour, composée de : Monsieur Edouard LOOS, Président Madame Christine SIMON-ROSSENTHAL, Présidente Monsieur Jacques LE VAILLANT,

    The Edward Snowden revelations indicated that GCHQ (being one of the United Kingdom intelligence services) was running an operation, codenamed “TEMPORA”, which allowed it to tap into and

s8EFC8F8 { width:32.36pt; display:inline-block } .sFBBFC6C9 { width:290.51pt; display:inline-block } THIRD SECTION   DECISION   AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF   Application no. 39633/98 by Edward

The fact that the applicant’s case had been tried on the merits is the clear evidence that the applicant had access to court and that he had thus lost his victim status.

The Court has established clear and extensive case-law concerning complaints relating to the excessive length of civil and criminal proceedings and the lack of effective remedy (see, for example, Rutkowski

The Court has established clear and extensive case-law concerning complaints relating to the excessive length of civil proceedings (see, for example, Gazsó v.