CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

19 549 résultats pour « Leneel »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0401DEC000277203

Admin. suprême

1 avril 2008

1 avril 2008

2007 1,800€ 418.74€ 2,218.74€ 2 5474/03 UZEJNOVIČ Begajet 6 years for 1 level of jurisdiction 24 September 2007 2,160€ 419.34€ 2,579.34€ 3 18423/03 LAZAR Justina 5 years and 10 months for 2 levels of

Page 9 sur 978

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0116JUD002395117

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2025

16 janvier 2025

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0116JUD000169618

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2025

16 janvier 2025

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0314JUD001990718

Admin. suprême

14 mars 2024

14 mars 2024

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0108JUD001378920

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2026

8 janvier 2026

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1013JUD003702621

Admin. suprême

13 octobre 2022

13 octobre 2022

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0915JUD003000021

Admin. suprême

15 septembre 2022

15 septembre 2022

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0505JUD001783921

Admin. suprême

5 mai 2022

5 mai 2022

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0609JUD003866820

Admin. suprême

9 juin 2022

9 juin 2022

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0112JUD000719204

Admin. suprême

12 janvier 2017

12 janvier 2017

/09/2002     15/12/2004   14/08/2003     16/09/2009   10 months and 28 days 3 levels of jurisdiction   4 years, 9 months and 2 days 3 levels of jurisdiction   500

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1019JUD001234516

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 2023

19 octobre 2023

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1208JUD001610803

Admin. suprême

8 décembre 2016

8 décembre 2016

of jurisdiction   5 years and 15 days 2 levels of jurisdiction     Art. 6 (1) - non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions - Alushta City Court of Autonomous Republic

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0131DEC001447618

Admin. suprême

31 janvier 2019

31 janvier 2019

#xa0;   11/02/2013     12/05/2014   17/10/2012     10/04/2014     15/08/2018   2 months and 25 days 3 levels of jurisdiction   1 year and 2 months 3 levels

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-110630

Admin. suprême

14 mars 2012

14 mars 2012

When about 1988 the State Railway Company (“MÁV”) replaced its steam engines with diesel ones, the noise level increased significantly.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1214DEC002714819

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2023

14 décembre 2023

It is noted that the applicant made use of all the appeals and objections available to him, having his case analysed twice within the same level of jurisdiction at all three levels of jurisdiction.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0829DEC004140416

Admin. suprême

29 août 2019

29 août 2019

      69284/16 16/11/2016 Dobrica Mihailović 02/12/1951 Mihailović Vesna Belgrade 11/12/2008   04/07/2013   4 years and 6 months and 24 days 2 levels of jurisdiction   &#

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1103DEC003610207

Admin. suprême

3 novembre 2016

3 novembre 2016

; 21/04/2008   8 months and 2 days 3 levels of jurisdiction   4 years, 5 months and 11 days 3 levels of jurisdiction       48971/13 24/07/2013 Yuriy Volodymyrovych KOVALYOV 31/

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-231181

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2024

22 janvier 2024

Despite several attempts by Termoelectrica to reduce the noise level, it persisted.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0721JUD000417406

Admin. suprême

21 juillet 2016

21 juillet 2016

(s) of jurisdiction     4 year(s) and 7 month(s) and 7 day(s) 2 level(s) of jurisdiction   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913DEC001528115

Admin. suprême

13 septembre 2018

13 septembre 2018

Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth   Representative’s name and location Start of proceedings End of proceedings Total length Levels of jurisdiction Domestic court file number  

Source officielle