CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-224834
25 avril 2023
In particular, was the application of this principle compatible with the Court’s case-law on "excessive formalism" (see, among many others, Zubac v.
ECLI:CEDH:001-244117
12 juin 2025
the appeal on points of law ( autosufficienza del ricorso in cassazione ) impose a disproportionate restriction on the applicant’s right to a court, guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Zubac
ECLI:CEDH:001-244131
(see Zubac v. Croatia [GC], no. 40160/12, §§   76-79, 5 April 2018, and, mutatis mutandis , Kostadin Mihaylov v.
ECLI:CEDH:001-237366
10 septembre 2024
access to court for the determination of his appeal against the authorities’ refusal to grant his change of surname in Moldovan civil records, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Zubac
ECLI:CEDH:001-249861
24 mars 2026
court under Article   6 §   1 of the Convention, in so far as his constitutional appeal was dismissed for non-exhaustion of “prior effective domestic remedies” (see, among other authorities, Zubac
ECLI:CEDH:001-242103
30 janvier 2025
In particular: (a) did the domestic courts’ approach to the applicants’ action disclose an “excessive formalism” violating their right of access to a court (see Zubac v. Croatia ,   [GC], no.
ECLI:CEDH:001-249868
23 mars 2026
errors in specifying the legal remedy or the competent authority do not extinguish an accused’s procedural rights, did the domestic courts’ approach amount to excessive formalism (see, among others, Zubac
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-249597
9 mars 2026
le pourvoi en cassation du requérant irrecevable a-t-elle porté atteinte à son droit d’accès à un tribunal au sens des dispositions de l’article   6 § 1 de la Convention (voir, parmi d’autres, Zubac
ECLI:CEDH:001-231176
23 janvier 2024
court for the determination of her civil rights and obligations, in accordance with Article   6 § 1 of the Convention, given the rejection of her appeal against the decision of February 2020 (see Zubac
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2953298-3250203
3 décembre 2009
Dezember 2003 wies das Bundesverfassungsgericht die Verfassungsbeschwerde des Beschwerdeführers zurück.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0717JUD000547506
17 juillet 2018
Luxembourg , n o 55291/15, § 30, 27   juin 2017, et Zubac , précité, § 82).
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0220DEC000892813
20 février 2024
    The general principles of the Court’s case law on the right of access to a court have been set out in numerous judgments (see, for example, Zubac v.
4ème chambre
DTA_2202838_20231012
12 octobre 2023
Lauranson, rapporteur public, - les observations de Me Zurbach, représentant l'association Cineplan et celles de Me Hamidi, représentant l'établissement public industriel et commercial du Domaine d'O
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0919DEC003776719
19 septembre 2023
    The general principles emerging from the Court’s case-law concerning the right of access to a court have been summarised in Zubac v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0205DEC000647225
5 février 2026
errors occur only on one side, that of the applicant or the relevant authorities, the Court would normally place the burden of the adverse consequences of such errors on the one who has produced it (see Zubac
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0422DEC001317423
22 avril 2025
    The relevant principles on the right of access to a court were summarised in Zubac v. Croatia ([GC], no. 40160/12, §§ 76-79, 5   April 2018). 18.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0619DEC002034818
19 juin 2025
    The general principles concerning access to a court, including the superior courts, have been summarised in Zubac v. Croatia ([GC], no.   40160/12, §§ 76-86, 5 April 2018). 12.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1012DEC000524819
12 octobre 2021
securing equality of arms, preventing arbitrariness, securing the effective determination of a dispute and adjudication within a reasonable time, and ensuring legal certainty and respect for the court (see Zubac
CASELAW;CLIN;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:002-12170
30 octobre 2018
Turquie [GC], 48939/99, 30   novembre 2004, Note d’information   69   ; voir aussi Zubac c.   Croatie [GC], 40160/12, 5   avril 2018, Note d’information 217   ; Eşim c.
ECLI:CEDH:001-229309
6 novembre 2023
En particulier, l’application de cette règle était-elle compatible avec les principes dégagés par la Cour en matière de « formalisme excessif » ( Zubac c.
Page 9 sur 23