CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1009JUD001070902
9 octobre 2008
Therefore, the applicant’s right to a fair trial guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 had not been violated. 28.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1011DEC001250586
11 octobre 1988
  Furthermore attempted instigation was, in various countries, not punishable at all.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0529REP001371088
29 mai 1991
     ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FACTS         (paras. 19 - 43) .....................................
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0917REP003146496
17 septembre 1998
  The purpose of the Report, pursuant to Article 31 of the Convention, is:     (i)   to establish the facts, and     (ii)   to state an opinion as to whether the facts
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1952452-2061288
20 mars 2007
    Principal facts   The applicant, Alicja Tysiąc, is a Polish national who was born in 1971 and lives in Warsaw.
ECLI:CEDH:003-3205060-3573127
20 juillet 2010
facts   The first applicant, A., is a Libyan national,   born in 1972 and   living in the Netherlands.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0922JUD000625114
22 septembre 2022
    The general principles of relevance have been summarised, for example, in Navalnyy v. Russia [GC], nos. 29580/12 and 4 others, §§   98-103, 15   November 2018). 8.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1968:0719DEC000246565
19 juillet 1968
Les faits reprochés au requérant sont en rapport étroit avec les faits exposés à propos du crime d'escroquerie (cf. par. 4 si-dessus).
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1002DEC002507002
2 octobre 2007
Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicant, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mrs Faime
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0513JUD003705522
13 mai 2025
    The facts of the case may be summarised as follows. THE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS 5 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1023JUD000244007
23 octobre 2008
THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0216JUD004313713
16 février 2017
THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.     The applicant was born in 1973 and lives in Baku.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0930JUD003960998
30 septembre 2004
THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 8.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1203JUD000891705
3 décembre 2009
In them he repeated his wish to be allowed to exercise his right to a fair trial. 28.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0607JUD004865313
7 juin 2018
The fact that a suspicion is held in good faith is insufficient.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1008JUD007205117
8 octobre 2019
been a violation of the ne bis in idem principle. 4.
CASELAW;ADVISORYOPINIONS;PROTOCOL16;OPINIONS;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:003-6708599-9909826
29 mai 2020
d’avoir ainsi, en usurpant le pouvoir, aboli de fait les principales dispositions pertinentes de l’ordre constitutionnel   ; b)     en sa qualité de commandant en chef, d’avoir ordonné,
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0114DEC004052106
14 janvier 2014
    General principles 52.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD000340107
17 janvier 2012
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0202JUD005991300
2 février 2006
The fact that the applicant was charged with a serious offence was sufficient justification. 37.
Page 93 sur 195