Under those provisions, any party to the proceedings may apply to the court which delivered the judgment for restoration of a lost case file.

Furthermore, many people who have moved to the towns previously had a natural and spontaneous contact with unspoiled nature which is now lost.

    The applicants alleged that the United Kingdom law on adverse possession, by which they lost land with development potential to a neighbour, operated in violation of Article 1 of Protocol

[he] even lost consciousness in the police station ...” 38.

As a result, a VOG-17 grenade from an AGS ‑ 17 grenade launcher had been lost. The grenade had been fired through the bore of a grenade launcher.

A situation may arise in which a person seeking to acquire property lawfully acquires property which has been lost by its owner on account of a crime committed by other persons, and the person acquiring

    In 1981, having lost the Soviet passport issued to her in 1978, the applicant obtained a new passport.

She lost consciousness and remained in the street for about ten hours.

He considered that he could not be held liable for shortcomings in the postal services, and insisted that he had never lost interest in pursuing his case. 53.

  The Austrian authorities recognised that the applicant's wife had lost her Austrian nationality.

In particular, much time was lost in verifying the statement that S.B. Slyusar had disappeared.

. … He lost the cost of sending [his representative] diagonally across the world and back [with the sample] with a bit of time in a hotel. …     He lost the cost of Mr Smolny’s fare in the Euro-class

The third applicant also referred to Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, stating that as a result of the attack she had lost her belongings, which had been destroyed together with the house.

    The applicant claimed that as a result of the District Court decision of 26 October 1995 he had lost the amounts which he had to pay to the estate of the company, 44,737 euros (EUR).

submitted a document from the High/Magistrate’s Court of Lagos State, in Ikeja, dated 1   September 2010, according to which he had made a sworn declaration to the court on that day that he had lost

On 29 November 1999 the first applicant submitted an application to the Strasbourg Court alleging that he had lost his job and that his employment prospects had been restricted as a result of the application

In his submission, although the State had established a legal framework entitling such former owners to compensation, it had failed to do so in respect of persons who, like him, had lost their property

  The action was allowed by the Regional Court of Salzburg on 1 October 1985, but as the applicants' client had in the meantime lost his property the applicants refrained from introducing enforcement

They demanded the annulment of the reimbursement order on the ground that the villagers had lost all their property during the destruction of their villages.