Melek SIĞMAK     Firdevs OĞUZ     Durdu KESİKBAŞ     Ahmet ERCAN     Bilal GÖK     16.09.1992       08.11.1993  

    The applicants Ramazan İlter, Göksel Baykuş, Seydihan Güz, Turgut   Ergitürk, Erhan Bağcı and Mehmet İbrahimoğlu also complained about the sanitary and hygiene conditions.

  Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 121, ECHR   2000-IV; Süleyman Erkan v.   Turkey , no. 26803/02, §   31, 31   January   2008). 47.

against the Federal Republic of Germany lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Turkish national, Mr Erkan

Turkey (no. 75845/01) Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 The applicants, Necati Aydın and Ercan Şengül, are Turkish nationals who were born in 1972 and 1962, respectively. They live in İzmir.

/ Mersin 10 Musteyde Hacioglu 1954 Mersin 10 Ayse Esencag 1957 Mersin 10 Fikriye Ozgum 01/04/1937 Girne / Mersin 10 Mustafa Ozgum 27/11/1954 Girne / Mersin 10 Ali Ozgum 04/09/1957 Girne / Mersin 10 Ercan

reasons Length of pre-trial detention Delay in examination by the Constitutional Court Restriction of access to the investigation file Lack/Difficulties of legal assistance/other facilities 90 15892/18 Ercan

xa0; Ayşe ESENÇAĞ 01/01/1957 Mersin 10     Fikriye ÖZGÜM 01/04/1937 Girne / Mersin 10   Mustafa ÖZGÜM 27/11/1954 Girne / Mersin 10   Ali ÖZGÜM 04/09/1957 Girne / Mersin 10   Ercan

Erkan, a lawyer practising in Ankara. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent. 3.

The Swedish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms   Anna   Erman from the Ministry for Foreign Affairs. 3.

  Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 121, ECHR 2000-IV; Süleyman Erkan v.   Turkey , no. 26803/02, §   31, 31   January 2008). 77.

While States are entitled to require organisations seeking official registration to comply with reasonable legal formalities, that is always subject to the condition of proportionality (see Ertan and Others

Government”) of the complaints under Articles 6 and 8 of the Convention and to declare the remainder of the applications inadmissible; the decision to grant the applicants Barış Yaslan, Mustafa Burgaç, Erhan

under former Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by three Polish nationals, Mr Jerzy Gorzelik, Mr Rudolf Kołodziejczyk and Mr Erwin

The applicant and the applicant company were represented by Dr Grilc, Mr Vouk, Dr Škof and Ms Erman, lawyers practising in Ljubljana. 3.

Ernst Gabriel Richard Lueger Rosalia Leikam Raimund Hattler Willibald Perner Gerhard Hüttenbrenner Rudolf Bichler Hermann Rud Erich Mauracher Norbert Loacker Karl-Heinz Wabin Richard Kroisenbrunner Erwin

information on the reasons for arrest Failure/Delay to communicate decisions relating to detention Lack/Difficulties of legal assistance/other facilities           28 76280/17 Erkan

  The third applicant, Mr Erwin Sowa, born in 1944, is a steelworker residing in Katowice. They are represented before the Court by Mr   S. Waliduda, a lawyer practising in Wrocław, Poland.

    On 17 November 1995 the Istanbul State Security Court also found the author of the impugned article, Erhan Altun, guilty of an offence under section 8 § 1 of the 1991 Act.