CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0122DEC002550411
22 janvier 2019
The Court notes that on 21 March 2018 Law no. 7103 was enacted and published in the Official Gazette on 27 March 2018.
Page 97 sur 819
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-181924
7 mars 2018
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0122DEC005774110
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0522DEC002969811
22 mai 2018
Furthermore, subsequent to the enactment of section 23 of Law no. 7103 on 21 March 2018, all applicants who have a pending case before the Court concerning the independence and impartiality of the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0711DEC001430119
11 juillet 2023
39710/15, §§ 60-62, 10 March 2020), Hernehult v. Norway (no. 14652/16, §§ 61-63, 10 March 2020), M.L. v. Norway (no.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1108JUD001328404
8 novembre 2005
called and the entire case reheard.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0617JUD004385412
17 juin 2021
In the case of Shubitidze v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0925DEC003494197
25 septembre 2001
On 7 March 1990 this company laid an information against the applicant inter alia on the suspicion that the applicant had caused financial damage by abusing his position as financial manager of the company
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1210DEC003670113
10 décembre 2019
The materials of the civil case in which the applicants had been deprived of their parental authority included reports on inspections of the applicants’ living conditions carried out on 23
civ3
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2021:C300673
30 septembre 2021
Selon l'arrêt attaqué (Paris, 14 novembre 2019), la société Sibelco France, qui dispose d'un permis d'exploitation de carrières de sables et grès industriels, a été autorisée, par arrêté préfectoral du
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0710JUD002234714
10 juillet 2025
On 21 March 2013 Mr Vasylenko wrote an article called “Drained profitability of [V.]” which was published in Subbota Plus .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1211DEC002555302
11 décembre 2006
Referring to the case-law of the Federal Social Court the court confirmed that the forced labour carried by the applicant was not similar to the military or quasi-military service mentioned in sections
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1011DEC001112304
11 octobre 2005
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. On 1 May 2002 the applicant killed three persons.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0428DEC006685912
28 avril 2020
The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0306DEC003457504
6 mars 2007
A preliminary case assessment was carried out by a detective chief inspector, who audited all known information and documentation.
comm
6137221bcd580146773fa4d8
31 mai 1994
a demandé la réparation de ses préjudices ; Sur le premier moyen : Attendu que la société Castel fait grief à l'arrêt de l'avoir condamnée à payer à la société Castel la somme de 3 336 526 francs
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0108JUD002528207
8 janvier 2013
In the case of Baltiņš v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0330JUD003780116
30 mars 2021
In the meantime, between 28 February and 7 March 2014 the anti-terrorist squad carried out exercises to prepare for the operation. 15 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0219JUD001180485
19 février 1991
The first number is the case's position on the list of cases referred to the Court in the relevant year (second number).
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68446-68914
25 novembre 1999
Ten of them were later convicted in jury trials before Gulating High Court ( lagmannsrett ), from November 1988 to March 1992, the so-called “boomerang cases”.