AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-55516
18 novembre 1991
18 novembre 1991
by the Commission on 11 July 1990 and by the Government of Austria on 1 October 1990; Whereas in its judgment of 28 August 1991 the Court: - held
Source officielleProcédures collectives
69ddf133cdc6046d472d21cd
13 octobre 2025
13 octobre 2025
Précedemment : [Adresse 2] Actuellement : [Adresse 3] La SAS HELLO !
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68400-68868
25 juillet 2001
25 juillet 2001
The Court held unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the European Convention on Human Rights (right to a fair trial).
Source officiellePRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68478-68946
26 octobre 2000
26 octobre 2000
Poland (no. 30210/96), the European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 3 (prohibition of torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment) of the
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-891094-915712
11 décembre 2003
11 décembre 2003
Consequently, the Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1673406-1753592
23 mai 2006
23 mai 2006
The Court therefore held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-451299-452082
21 novembre 2001
21 novembre 2001
By some means these tapes entered general circulation, for which the applicant was held responsible by the Sheikh.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1008DEC002814510
8 octobre 2013
8 octobre 2013
No oral hearing was held during the Appeal Court proceedings. 8.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-631053-636480
10 octobre 2002
10 octobre 2002
Consequently, the Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 3.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1472302-1544866
11 octobre 2005
11 octobre 2005
The hearings held in connection with his requests for release were held in camera and neither the applicant, nor his lawyer could take part.
Source officielleContestations Honoraires
65b0c0e58d0ccf000877e780
22 janvier 2024
22 janvier 2024
[B] [H] a saisi Me Marianne Helias, membre de la Selarl Marianne Helias, avocate au barreau de Quimper, pour l'assister dans le cadre d'opérations de liquidation et partage.
Source officielleTribunal Administratif de Montreuil
ORTA_2111461_20221222
22 décembre 2022
22 décembre 2022
Dans ces conditions, la requête de la société Monument Café L'Hélice est devenue sans objet. Il n'y a plus lieu d'y statuer. Sur les frais liés au litige : 3.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-126314
12 août 2013
12 août 2013
It held in particular that: - the defendants should be prohibited from demonstrating in Kyiv city centre from 16 September 2002 onwards; - the participants of the movement “
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1336497-1400338
17 mai 2005
17 mai 2005
The Court held unanimously that it was unnecessary to examine the applicants’ further complaint under Article 6 § 1.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68223-68691
22 juin 2000
22 juin 2000
Belgium, the European Court of Human Rights held: unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial) of the European Convention on Human Rights in respect of Mr
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-662450-668641
3 décembre 2002
3 décembre 2002
The Court accordingly held unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2116472-2244644
20 septembre 2007
20 septembre 2007
The Court held unanimously that there had been: two violations of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights on account of Sıddık Onay having been ill-treated in police custody and the
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2142546-2275681
9 octobre 2007
9 octobre 2007
The Court held unanimously that: there had been a violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 (right to education) of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1841163-1932055
16 novembre 2006
16 novembre 2006
The Court held by six votes to one that there had been a violation of Article 2 (right to life) of the European Convention on Human Rights on account of the death of the applicant’s son; that there
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-550772-552572
14 mai 2002
14 mai 2002
The Court held, unanimously, that there had been: no violation of Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (right to life) concerning the killing of the applicant’
Source officiellePage 98 sur 2440