Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-572357-574894
18 juin 2002
18 juin 2002
The European Court of Human Rights held by six votes to one that there had been no violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-971307-1001683
8 avril 2004
8 avril 2004
The Court held unanimously that there: had been a violation of Article 2 (right to life) of the European Convention on Human Rights concerning Cavit Özalp’s death; had been a violation of
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3740509-4268858
28 novembre 2000
28 novembre 2000
The Commission referred [Note1] the case to the Court on 11 September 1999 and a hearing was held on 16 May 2000.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68381-68849
5 juin 2001
5 juin 2001
In each case (the judgments are available only in French) the European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No.1 (protection of property
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1309999-1373261
12 avril 2005
12 avril 2005
The Court accordingly held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1049247-1085914
13 juillet 2004
13 juillet 2004
The Court also held, unanimously, that the question of the application of Article 41 was not ready for decision. (The judgment is available in English and in French.) 1.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1407006-1469081
4 août 2005
4 août 2005
The European Court of Human Rights pointed out that it had already held that it was incompatible with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention to dismiss an appeal on points of law on the ground that it
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1714496-1797374
22 juin 2006
22 juin 2006
As it had already held in a similar case, the Court considered that if P.S. were to be deported that measure would also constitute a breach of Article 3 in respect of A.D and P.D.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3185277-3550235
1 juillet 2010
1 juillet 2010
Last, but not least, the cells in which the applicants had been held, had been continuously overcrowded, which was a problem of a structural nature, which in itself was in breach of the Convention
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68213-68681
2 mai 2000
2 mai 2000
Norway, the European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 10 (freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68232-68700
21 novembre 2000
21 novembre 2000
The Court dismissed the Government’s preliminary objection (unanimously) and held that: there had been violations of Article 2 (right to life) of the European Convention on Human Rights both on account
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2179856-2317745
20 novembre 2007
20 novembre 2007
The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 10 (freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2349165-2534057
13 mai 2008
13 mai 2008
The Court held unanimously that there had been: a violation of Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) of the European Convention on Human Rights on account of the applicant
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1170010-1217326
26 octobre 2004
26 octobre 2004
The Court held unanimously that there had been: a violation of Article 3 (prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment) of the European Convention on Human Rights concerning
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-710427-719763
6 mars 2003
6 mars 2003
It accordingly held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and dismissed the applicant’s claim for just satisfaction. (The judgment is in French only.)
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-7314
6 novembre 2012
6 novembre 2012
In the framework of the negotiations for the Agreement on Succession Issues, negotiations regarding the distribution of the SFRY’s guarantees of “old” foreign-currency savings were held in 2001 and 2002
Source officiellePRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2204926-2350295
4 décembre 2007
4 décembre 2007
The Court held, by 12 votes to five, that there had been a violation of Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68308-68776
28 novembre 2000
28 novembre 2000
The Commission referred [Note1] the case to the Court on 11 September 1999 and a hearing was held on 16 May 2000.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-110638
13 mars 2012
13 mars 2012
The conditions of the applicant’s detention During the first period of the applicant’s detention in Łódź Remand Centre he was held in six different cells.
Source officiellePRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1643206-1721623
12 avril 2006
12 avril 2006
The Court held unanimously that the finding of a violation constituted in itself sufficient just satisfaction for the non-pecuniary damage sustained by the applicant.
Source officiellePage 99 sur 2440