CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-238629
18 novembre 2024
The applicant alleges that her pre-trial detention violated Article 5 §§ 1, 3 and 4 of the Convention. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.
Page 99 sur 1635
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1011JUD003891107
11 octobre 2016
On 24 April 2004 the Vyborgskiy Federal District Court of Saint-Petersburg authorised the applicant’s pre-trial detention. He remained in custody pending investigation and trial. 7.
ECLI:CEDH:001-188237
12 novembre 2018
As to the criminal proceedings, a bill of indictment was compiled and submitted for trial. However, the case was then returned to the prosecutor (apparently, on two occasions).
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0729JUD003625006
29 juillet 2008
On 30 May 2006 the Warsaw Court of Appeal extended the applicant’s detention until 9 December 2006, considering that the trial court should be able to finish the trial before that date. 25
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0223JUD001675790
23 février 1994
The trial transcript reveals that the applicant was, however, able to hear the indictment read out at the beginning of the trial and pleaded "not guilty" to each of the seven counts put to him.
ECLI:CEDH:001-242818
17 mars 2025
detention; - The length of their pre-trial detention was excessive; - The magistrates’ courts who ruled on their pre-trial detention lacked independence and impartiality; -
ECLI:CEDH:001-228441
5 octobre 2023
in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based, in both sets of
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1016DEC007155501
16 octobre 2001
Einhorn will be recommitted, without a new trial, to serve the life sentence imposed after a trial at which he was not present, a sentencing at which he was not present, and an appeal he was not
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0605JUD001289506
5 juin 2012
After more than a year of trial proceedings, on 14 October 2005 the trial court decided to remit the case for further investigation.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1116JUD000091915
16 novembre 2017
The trial 18. After completion of the pre-trial investigation, the applicant’s case was sent to trial at the Sheki Court for Serious Crimes.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0223JUD001482402
23 février 2010
release pending trial.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0210JUD002650406
10 février 2015
at the trial.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0921JUD000739007
21 septembre 2010
Trial on indictment 40.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1221JUD000798306
21 décembre 2010
within a reasonable time or to release pending trial.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0330DEC005038999
30 mars 2000
They also complain that the trial was unfair.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1204JUD006405600
4 décembre 2007
The trial court had granted these requests. 22.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0711JUD003781410
11 juillet 2023
Proceedings concerning pre-trial detention 4 .
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1102DEC002409207
2 novembre 2010
On 9 November 2006 the prosecutor asked for an extension of the applicant’s detention pending trial.
ECLI:CEDH:001-175018
7 juin 2017
The pre-trial judge issued decisions in respect of both the aforementioned requests on 9 September 2011.
ECLI:CEDH:001-204802
31 août 2020
On 15 June 2010 the Leninskyy District Court of Sevastopol (“the District Court”) ordered the applicant’s pre-trial detention.