The applicant also argued that the wording of Article 147 of the Criminal Code in force at the time of the facts (December 2008) had provided for confiscation of only the price, the product

It was registered as FIR. 65/2007 and contained accusations against the applicant and three other members of the Franciscan JPIC of having violated Articles 295(b) and 295(c) of the Penal Code.

du code du travail, 111-3, 111-4 et 121-2 du code pénal, préliminaire, 591 et 593 du code de procédure pénale. 52.

de la loi française en vertu des dispositions de l'article 309 du Code Civil dès lors que l'un et l'autre époux sont domiciliés en France ; Attendu que l'article 297-1 alinéa 2 du Code Civil dispose

In the investigator’s view, the above disclosed offences under Articles 294 and 298 of the Criminal Code.

In the investigator’s view, the above article disclosed offences under Articles 294 and 298 of the Criminal Code.

Article 299.     Right to the inviolability of one’s professional reputation “1.

applicant guilty of, respectively, insult within the meaning of Article 266 of the Criminal Code ( Wetboek van Strafrecht ) and slander within the meaning of Article 261 of the Criminal Code, had not

visés aux moyens ; "alors 2 ) qu'aux termes de l'alinéa 2 de l'article 1741 du code général des impôts, les peines prévues que par l'alinéa premier dudit article ne sont applicables en cas de dissimulation

The court noted that in accordance with Article 106 § 5 of the Family Code a change of circumstances could justify a revision of the custody and contact measures and examined all events since April 2001

(article 123 of the Penal Code) X   Causing of explosions (article 183 of the Penal Code)   X Homicide or attempted homicide (article 237 of the Penal Code) X   Violence (articles 244 to

441-1 et 441-10 du Code pénal, 145 et 150 du Code pénal ancien, 591 et 593 du Code de procédure pénale, défaut de motifs, manque de base légale ; "en ce que l'arrêt attaqué a dit que Jacques X... s'était

It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the applications at the same time (Article 29 § 1). THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.

    Furthermore, as regards the application of Article 246 § 2 of the 2011 Criminal Code in respect of his conviction, the applicant argued that Article 291 of the 2011 Criminal Code best corresponded

    On 29 March 2016 all the applicants – except the ninth, sixteenth, eighteenth, nineteenth and thirty-sixth applicants – and other third parties asked the Eforie Sud local council to revoke

294 of the Code for judicial review of the enforcement of the orders (which are examined at one level of court only – Article 298 § 4 of the Code); and (c)   claims under Article 292 of the Code

The statements that the councillors had 'elected themselves to the local elections committee' and that they were 'concerned, above all, about their own interest and that of their families' related also

     In 1967 the applicant was convicted of having violated Sections 227, 228 and 292 of the Norwegian Penal Code (assault and inflicting bodily harm) and sentenced to preventive detention

Normally, under the applicable laws, the costs of the construction of local roads were to be borne by the local municipalities.