de la SELARL CAUSIDICOR, avocats au barreau de PARIS, avocats plaidant Le CCC : dossier FE : Me FRERING Me GRAGLIA DEFENDEURS Monsieur [X] [Y] [K] Madame [C] [G] [O] épouse [K] [Adresse 4] [Localité

       On 13 March 1989, a meeting was held by the local authority which identified three options: rehabilitation with the applicant, application for freeing for adoption or a

In the case of Frödinge Grus & Åkeri AB v.

    Ex gratia payments 8.

The application freeing B. for adoption was granted, the applicant's consent being dispensed with on the grounds that it was being unreasonably withheld.

The parents and grandparents were informed in December 1990 that rehabilitation was no longer planned and an application was made for a freeing for adoption order.   10.

     In July 1991 the County Court made an order freeing C. for adoption.

    On 28 January 2013 the applicant applied for ex gratia compensation within the framework of the Compensation Act for violations committed in certain situations of public care of children

The High Court also granted an injunction freezing Superwood’s assets up to the value of IR£ 5,000,000 to cover the estimated legal costs of the insurers. 18.

Court HR, Fredin v. Sweden judgment (no. 2) of 23 February 1994, Series A no. 283-A, p. 10, para. 21).