BEN MADHKOUR, avocat au barreau des HAUTS-DE-SEINE, vestiaire : 183 ORDONNANCE Par décision publique, rendue en premier ressort, contradictoire susceptible d’appel dans les conditions de l’article 795

In reality, it had been signed by R. As there had been no intention from the side of a representative of Tradeco Enterprises Inc to be involved in the agreement, the purchase document was fictitious.

In its conclusions, the District Court held inter alia that the estate at the time of M.’s death could not be considered a party to the case, as the division of the estate had been concluded in September

as a disability pension, to be adjusted in accordance with legal requirements, and awarded him a lump sum of RUB 104,405.82 in respect of the outstanding benefits, to be paid by the Ministry of Finance

as a disability pension, to be adjusted in accordance with legal requirements, and awarded him a lump sum of RUB 104,405.82 in respect of the outstanding benefits, to be paid by the Ministry of Finance

At stake at the present cases was the applicants’ legitimate expectation to receive monthly payments in a particular amount and, more precisely, to have these payments index-linked in accordance with a

at 26 and 26a Pikk Street be entered in the Buildings Register. 11.

In that connection, they contended that it could not be established with certainty whether there have been any changes in the status of the applicant’s successors.

set at half the value of the land but reasonable reductions might be granted in appropriate circumstances.

It   pointed out that in 1945 the property had been designated as accommodation for employees of the new university in Toruń.

by other evidence in order for ownership to be established.

They must therefore be declared admissible. C.     Merits 27.     The Court notes that the judgments in the applicants’ favour have not been fully enforced up to date. 28.

been repealed or declared unconstitutional; they thus remained in force and had to be applied to the present case.

and dangers in Lebanon that they are in general not to be deported to Lebanon.

, will be able to lodge [with civil courts] their claims for payment in an amount which will be calculated with the application of the indexation clause.

and does not produce a continuing situation of “deprivation” in respect of the rights concerned (see, inter alia , Malhous v.

I have been in many chases, and this particular individual gave me the impression that he was familiar with this kind of thing.” 3.     Mr Markou “I ride a motorcycle.

    On 27 March 2007 the applicant was arrested on suspicion of having been involved in drug trafficking. He was remanded in custody. 8.

enunciated in the first rule” (see, among other authorities, Anheuser-Busch Inc. v.

in time and had only been informed of the judgments in October   2005, when the prosecutor's inquiry had been opened.