NANTERRE sous le numéro 722 057 460 [Adresse 2] [Localité 5] Représentée par Me Juliette VOGEL de la SELAS HMN & PARTNERS, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : P581 Ayant pour avocat plaidant Me Sixtine

Localité 8] Représentées par Me Catherine Camus-Demailly, avocat au barreau de Douai, avocat constitué, assistée de Me Juliette Vogel, avocat au barreau de Paris, avocat plaidant, substituée par Me Sixtine

Conclusion : no violation (sixteen votes to one).

    The case concerns the question of whether administrative-offence proceedings concerning the refusal by the applicant to wear a face mask (part of the measures to control the spread of the

On 28 September 2004 the Court of Appeal, sitting as a three-judge panel presided by Judge G., upheld the judgment of 3 August 2004.

  The Court held: by sixteen votes to one, that there had been no violation of Article 9 (freedom of thought, conscience and religion) of the European Convention on Human Rights; by sixteen votes

} .s1B61D60 { width:156.43pt; display:inline-block }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 50527/21 Dalibor MIĽAN against Slovakia   The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting

Ashness, Solicitor and Legal Director to the Wear District Valley Council.

                 against Austria           The European Commission of Human Rights sitting

    According to the applicant he had to wear handcuffs during the public hearings throughout the entire criminal trial. 10.

According to the applicant, he was informed that he would have to wear his prison clothes and handcuffs to attend the funeral. 8.

inline-block } .s7B0354FA { width:193.28pt; display:inline-block }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 14687/08 Ioan MUREŞAN against Romania The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting

He refused to wear military uniform or carry out the orders of the regiment’s commanding officer. He was detained in the regimental prison, where he refused to wear prison uniform. 18.

He further argued that the policy was discriminatory as it unjustly differentiated between two analogous comparators, namely prisoners wishing to wear a poppy and prisoners wishing to wear an Easter lily

The courtyard should be equipped with benches for sitting. Inmates may be deprived of their daily exercise as punishment for disciplinary offences.

font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }  The European Commission of Human Rights sitting

Moreover, these scriptures did not oblige followers to wear religious clothing in their daily life.

    Boys Boys shall wear a jacket, shirt and trousers. They shall wear a tie ... c.

Pupils are in principle allowed to wear religious signs.

    The Government submitted that the applicant had not requested to wear his own clothes.