Croatia (no. 3742/02) Boca v. Croatia (no. 9504/02) Divjak v. Croatia (no. 9520/02) Miščević v. Croatia (no. 15312/02) Surla v.

After a couple of months they returned to the Republic of Croatia and lived in different parts of the then occupied Croatian territories.

In accordance with that proposal, on 23 September 1999 the Government of Croatia adopted the Decision on Recovery and Restructuring of the Croatia banka d.d. (“the Government Decision”).

Croatia , no. 70923/11, 9 January 2014)?   3.

Croatia (no. 71614/01)   Violation Article 6 § 1 Marinković v. Croatia (no. 9138/02)   Violation Article 6 § 1 Varićak v. Croatia (no. 78008/01)   Violation Article 6 § 1 Bubaš v.

Croatia - 66408/12 Judgment 12.2.2015 [Section I] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Fair hearing Inability to obtain a rehearing after conviction in absentia: violation Facts – In 1992, while

11pt } .s3985515B { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } FOURTH SECTION   DECISION   AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF   Application no. 51891/99 by Mladen NALETILIĆ against Croatia

Firstly, he argues that he was deprived of his right to a fair trial in the civil proceedings concerning his request for compensation for his destoyed property in so far as the Pula County Court quashed

Croatia , no. 27310/09, 24 April 2014; and Oluić v. Croatia , no. 61260/08, 20 May 2010)?   2.

to a fair ... hearing ... by [a] ... tribunal ...”

QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Did the applicant have a fair hearing in the determination of the criminal charges against him, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention?

QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Did the applicant have a fair hearing in the determination of the criminal charges against him, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention?

Y..., salarié de la société yougoslave Intereuropa, assurée par la société Croatia Slava, lequel était muni de la carte internationale d'assurance dite " carte verte " ; que le Bureau central français

; que la société Cromaro Madeleine les a assignés en fixation du prix du second bail renouvelé en s'opposant notamment au déplafonnement du loyer ; Attendu que la société Cromaro Madeleine fait grief

Croatia , no. 48778/99, § 33, ECHR 2002-II, Multiplex v.   Croatia , no.   58112/00, §   55, 10   July 2003 and Aćimović v.   Croatia , no.

In October 1991 the war broke out in Croatia.

homeland war in Croatia from 7 August 1990 to 30 June 1996 are to be stayed.

    The applicant was born in 1929 and lives in Pula, Croatia. 5.     On 3 May 1991 his goods stored in a kiosk in Zadar, Croatia, were damaged by unknown perpetrators. 6.

Croatia. They are represented before the Court by Mr Ivan Šalina, a lawyer practising in Zadar. A.

  Croatia , no. 48778/99, § 33, ECHR 2002-II, and Multiplex v.   Croatia , no.