His claim for widows’ benefits was made on 18 July 2000 and was rejected on 28 July 2000 on the ground that he was not entitled to widow’s benefits because he was not a woman.

Russia (communicated case) - 40419/19   Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8-1 Respect for family life Respect for private life Alleged lack of investigations into online harassment against a woman

That application was refused by the Benefits Agency on 2   March 2000 on the grounds that the applicant was not a woman.

The applicant appealed and on 20 August 2002 the Appeal Tribunal decided that the appeal could not succeed because the applicant was not a woman.

The applicant claims that, had he been a woman and had his wife been a man, he would have been aware of his entitlement to widow’s benefits in the event of her death.

To be eligible for WMA, a woman had to be entitled to child benefit. The Court considers, as it held in Cornwell v. the United Kingdom (no.

1986; 2) assault and indecent assault of a named woman between 1 September 1986 and 30 November 1986; 3) assault, indecent assault, robbery and abduction of a named woman between 10 June 1986 and 31 December

In 2003, after his unsuccessful asylum application, he married a Swiss woman 29 years older than himself.

Sudan, she would face a real risk of being subjected to treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention mainly due to the general situation in the country and her particular vulnerability as a single woman

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête, enregistrée le 22 février 2022, la société AIC BAT, représentée par Me Woimant, demande au tribunal : 1°) de condamner l'État à lui verser la somme de 31

Par deux mémoires, enregistrés les 16 septembre 2019 et 7 juin 2021, la commune du Puy-Sainte-Réparade, représentée par Me Woimant, conclut au rejet de la requête et à ce que la somme de 3 000 euros soit

B E et Mme A E, représentés par Me Woimant, demandent au tribunal, dans le dernier état de leurs écritures : 1°) d'annuler la délibération du 19 mai 2022 par laquelle le conseil municipal de Sénas a

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête et un mémoire en réplique enregistrés le 29 septembre 2023 et le 27 juin 2024, la société ERM automatismes industriels, représentée par Me Woimant, demande

That application was refused by the Benefits Agency on 2   March 2000 on the grounds that the applicant was not a woman.

If the applicant were a woman, he could look forward to entitlement to a Widow’s Pension in the future, when he would no longer be entitled to the Widowed Mother’s Allowance. 4.

, or (2) the date of retirement fixed by a notice, at age 65+ for a man or 60+ for a woman, would receive a frozen rate of REA for life.

On 4 May 2001 the applicant was informed that his claim had been disallowed as he was not a woman. On 30 May 2001 the applicant appealed.

His claim for widows’ benefits was made on 8 February 2003 and was rejected on 13 February 2003 on the ground that he was not entitled to widows’ benefits because he was not a woman.

His claim for widows’ benefits was made in February 2002 and was rejected on 9 March 2002 on the ground that he was not entitled to widows’ benefits because he was not a woman.

The applicant challenged this decision before the High Administrative Court ( Visoki upravni sud Republike Hrvatske ) arguing, in particular, that she had been discriminated against as a woman who had