the Queen [2009] UKPC 40, the Privy Council found that the appellant’s trial had been unfair due to excessive interventions from the trial judge and quashed the conviction.

In the High Court of Australia, in The Queen v.

  The Australian Royal Commission was appointed in July 1984 by the Queen to enquire into the conduct of the Australian tests.

He is appointed by the Queen and must have been legally qualified for ten years (section 83A of the 1955 Act).

lodged her judicial review claim on 21 February 2006; Mr Jummum (provisionally listed on 23 November 2005 and removed from the list on 18   August 2006), who lodged his claim on 21 February 2006; Ms Quinn

The applicant was informed that an allegation had been made regarding his sexual orientation (the terms “queen” and “out and out bender” were used) and it was made clear that the investigators had been

He is represented before the Court by Mr John Quinn, a lawyer practising in Dublin.   A.

1974 Tullibody British   HMP Glenochil     TAYLOR & KELLY EU elections 4 June 2009   Detained at relevant time at HMP Glenochil     49077/09 19/08/2009   Michael QUINN

1974 Tullibody British   HMP Glenochil     TAYLOR & KELLY EU elections 4 June 2009   Detained at relevant time at HMP Glenochil     49077/09 19/08/2009   Michael QUINN

procedural rules thereof, but it requires in addition that any deprivation of liberty should be consistent with the purpose of Article 5 (art. 5), namely to protect individuals from arbitrariness (see the Quinn

          In particular, the control and management of the BBC is vested by the Charter in the Governors of the Corporation who are appointed by the Queen-in-council

The Court of Appeal recently returned to this issue in Howell v. the Queen ((2003) EWCA Crim. 1): “ ... the public interest that inheres in reasonable disclosure by a suspected person of what he has to

    The privilege against self-incrimination is deep-rooted in English law (see, for example, Lam Chi-Ming v. the Queen [1991] 2 AC).

Tynwald legislates in domestic matters, the laws it adopts requiring ratification by the Queen in Council; the Home Secretary is responsible for advising the Privy Council whether or not to recommend that

In the High Court of Australia, in The Queen v.

.; a picket in front of the World Patent Protection Summit at 8 to 10 a.m. in Great Queen Street WC1; a demonstration at 8.30 a.m. in the Pall Mall area against the arms trade; an investiture between 8.30

Dermot Quinn (judgment of the Belfast Crown Court of 23 December 1991), the trial judge rejected a submission to the effect that an adverse inference under Article 3 of the 1988 Order should not be drawn

  On 29 April 1987, on the recommendation of the Home Secretary, Her Majesty the Queen remitted the applicant's life sentence by means of the Royal Prerogative.

Commonwealth jurisdictions In Reyes v. the Queen [2002] UKPC 11 the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council considered that a mandatory death penalty for murder by shooting was not compatible with section