CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1201JUD003391402
1 décembre 2005
    On 17 July 2001 the registry of the Magadan Town Court sent a copy of the judgment to the applicant’s old address in Khabarovsk. 27.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0124DEC005992708
24 janvier 2017
That was because the summons had been sent to the applicant.
2 SS
CETAT:CETATEXT000007837968
22 octobre 1993
Rouen l'annulation de la décision contenue dans une lettre, en date du 12 septembre 1986, du maire de Gaillarbois-Cressenville, et par laquelle celui-ci aurait interdit la circulation automobile sur la sente
soc
6079b0c59ba5988459c502d9
5 novembre 1981
DU CONTENTIEUX DE LA SECURITE SOCIALE DU PUY DE DOME ; CONDAMNE LA DEMANDERESSE, ENVERS LA DEFENDERESSE, AUX DEPENS LIQUIDES A LA SOMME DE ..., EN CE NON COMPRIS LE COUT DES SIGNIFICATIONS DU PRE SENT
Tribunal Administratif de MELUN
ORTA_2301288_20250515
15 mai 2025
00063 du 30 janvier 2023 par lequel le maire de Couilly-Pont-aux-Dames s'est opposé à sa déclaration préalable déposée pour la création d'un mur de clôture de 2 mètres en parpaing sur un terrain sis 5 sente
Tribunal Administratif de Lyon
ORTA_2308267_20250130
30 janvier 2025
Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête enregistrée le 6 septembre 2023, Mme B A, représentée par Me Sene, demande au tribunal : 1°) de condamner la commune de Ferney-Voltaire à l'indemniser des
Tribunal Administratif de Caen
ORTA_2202240_20221205
5 décembre 2022
ne formule aucun moyen tendant à contester la légalité de la mesure de placement à l'isolement dont il a fait l'objet, se borne à indiquer qu'il est contraint de rester à l'isolement et qu'il ne se sent
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2012:SO01642
3 juillet 2012
cette exigence peut être satisfaite par la présence additionnelle de copilotes plus jeunes ; 4°/ que le juge a l'obligation de ne pas dénaturer les documents de la cause ; que les rapports remis au Sénat
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-117164
13 février 2013
The final decision in that regard was adopted by the Senate of the Supreme Court on 11   June 2008.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1118DEC002795802
18 novembre 2008
THE LAW On 12 August 2008 the Registry of the Court sent the applicant’s representative a letter requesting the applicant to confirm that he had agreed to the Government’s offer of settlement.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0929DEC004118505
29 septembre 2009
By letter dated 15 September 2008, the Government’s observations were sent to the applicants’ legal representative, who was requested to submit any comments, together with any claims for just satisfaction
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1117DEC002982205
17 novembre 2009
By letter dated 10 October 2008 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant, who was requested to submit any comments together with any claims for just satisfaction in reply by 28   November
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1117DEC003365403
By a letter dated 2 April 2009 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant’s son, who was requested to submit any observations together with any claims for just satisfaction in reply by 20
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0127DEC003900602
27 janvier 2009
The Government’s observations were received on 19 April 2006 and sent to the applicant, who was requested to submit any observations together with any claims for just satisfaction in reply by 30 June 2006
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-5454
12 mars 2002
On searching the second applicant’s chambers the investigators seized an internal and confidential letter which post-dated the article and had been sent by the director of the registration and domains
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0624DEC000093902
24 juin 2004
By letter of the Registry of the Court of 19 December 2003 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0111DEC003623607
11 janvier 2011
Consequently, on 29 June 2010 the Registry has sent them to the indicated address another letter, inviting them to submit observations in reply and just satisfaction claims.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0111DEC003540004
On 11   October 2007 the applicant sent a letter asking the Registry to assign a lawyer to represent him before the Court because he had not been able to find one in Poland.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0113DEC003839208
13 janvier 2011
THE LAW By letter dated 14 June 2010 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant, who was requested to submit any observations together with any claims for just satisfaction in reply by 26
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0222DEC003170506
22 février 2011
The Government’s reply was sent to the applicant’s representative for comments on 8   October   2010. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.
Page 101 sur 1290
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.