Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3020595-3340273
11 février 2010
11 février 2010
The applicants repeatedly contacted numerous State officials both in person and in writing, complaining of the abduction and their beating and asking for help to find Ramzan.
Source officiellePRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2271716-2429869
15 février 2008
15 février 2008
The Court held unanimously that in both cases there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time) of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68334-68802
22 mai 2001
22 mai 2001
Turkey, the European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman treatment) of the European Convention on Human Rights; a violation
Source officiellePRESS;ADMISSIBILITYDECISIONS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1304294-1360416
30 mars 2005
30 mars 2005
A Chamber hearing was held on 29 January 2004.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1287262-1342007
17 mars 2005
17 mars 2005
The Court held by six votes to one: that there had been a violation of Article 13 (right to an effective remedy) of the Convention.
Source officiellePRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68499-68967
10 mai 2001
10 mai 2001
In the judgment given on 29 June 1995, which concerned three cases, Lord Browne-Wilkinson held, among other things, that public policy considerations were such that local authorities should not be held
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2036995-2152962
12 juin 2007
12 juin 2007
It held that there had been a violation of Article 3 and that it was not necessary to examine the question under Article 8.
Source officiellePRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1386055-1447213
30 juin 2005
30 juin 2005
A Chamber hearing was held at the Human Rights Building in Strasbourg on 18 September 2003.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3088037-3418089
1 avril 2010
1 avril 2010
administration of the Republic of Ingushetia and departments of the interior and prosecutors’ offices at different levels, describing in detail the circumstances of Bashir’s abduction and asking for help
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-969060-999334
30 mars 2004
30 mars 2004
The Court therefore held that there had been no violation of Article 7.
Source officiellePRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2082547-2205687
30 août 2007
30 août 2007
They also relied on the Land Registration Act 1925, which provided that, after the expiry of the 12-year period, the registered owner held the land in trust for the squatter.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1480975-1548511
13 octobre 2005
13 octobre 2005
It therefore held that there had been no violation of Article 3 as regards the force used against the applicants during the incident in question.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68409-68877
10 avril 2001
10 avril 2001
The Court also awarded (six votes to one) GBP 38,754.77 for pecuniary damage and GBP 20,000 for non-pecuniary damage, to be held by the applicant for his son’s widow and child. 1.
Source officiellePRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1691072-1772506
8 juin 2006
8 juin 2006
The first ended when the Hanover Regional Court held that the applicant was entitled to damages at a rate of 80% for the consequences of the accident.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1695958-1777591
8 juin 2006
8 juin 2006
The Court further held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 (access to court) .
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-115993
18 décembre 2012
18 décembre 2012
It held that it was admissible, and that the mayor’s decision was subject to judicial review.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-587422-591161
15 juillet 2002
15 juillet 2002
The Court held unanimously that there had been: a violation of Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) of the European Convention on Human Rights; a violation of Article 5 § 3
Source officielleRéférés
69e9ba63cdc6046d4738d84d
28 janvier 2025
28 janvier 2025
Mme Claudia VIRAPIN, greffier RG n°: 2024R01346 DEMANDEUR SAS SOLAIRE CLIM CHAUFFAGE [Adresse 1] comparant par SELARL CABINET LEX-PART AVOCATS Mes [H] [Q] et [J] [T] [Adresse 2] DEFENDEUR SASU HELLIO
Source officiellecomm
6137212bcd580146773f1904
6 février 1990
6 février 1990
septembre 1987 par la cour d'appel de Colmar (1re chambre civile), au profit de : 1°/ Monsieur Guy A..., demeurant ... à Longeville-lès-Metz (Moselle), 2°/ La société à responsabilité limitée HELLINS
Source officielleciv1
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2023:C110475
14 juin 2023
14 juin 2023
E _________________________ AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANÇAIS _________________________ DÉCISION DE LA COUR DE CASSATION, PREMIÈRE CHAMBRE CIVILE, DU 14 JUIN 2023 L'association Les Vieilles Hélices
Source officiellePage 106 sur 2440
HELLIERE, Patrick, Gérard, Pascal
17/04/2026
Voir →
SARL HELLIER
18/12/2025
Voir →
SCCV DU HELLIER, STE EN LIQUIDATION
10/08/2025
Voir →
SELARL DU DOCTEUR HELLIER
15/07/2025
Voir →
Roul De La Helliere, Gaétan, Aymeric, Raymond
20/04/2025
Voir →