CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
comm
613722f2cd5801467740397e
9 décembre 1997
société Matech) a vendu à la société Auto Réemploi une remorque et son contenu de pièces de rechange d'occasion; qu'en vue de leur déplacement du port de Marseille à celui de Casablanca (Maroc) à bord
Page 11 sur 368
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0701JUD006478917
1 juillet 2021
The Board held a meeting on 25 and 26 August 2016. The bench of the Board was composed of one jurist, one psychologist and one lay person.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0729JUD002830103
29 juillet 2008
On 11 December 2003 the Accident Board rejected her application.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0922JUD001383988
22 septembre 1994
Removing the case from the board without remitting it to another tribunal would, moreover, be tantamount to a denial of justice. 3. The Appeals Board’s decision of 29 September 1987 15.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-106994
14 septembre 2011
:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .sE42162BA { width:19.8%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0629DEC001813191
29 juin 1992
The Board referred to Section 10 para. 2 of the Act.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0708DEC008054512
8 juillet 2014
On 17 October 2011, the Migration Board rejected the application.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0516JUD003947498
16 mai 2002
to comply with its constitutional duties through the Board.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0217JUD002263504
17 février 2009
The opinions were submitted to the Appellate Board.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-119137
5 avril 2013
On appeal, the decision was upheld by the Immigration Appeals Board on 2 March 2007. 14.
ECLI:CEDH:001-163130
25 avril 2016
On 29 June 2012, the decision was upheld by Østfold County Social Affairs Board ( Fylkesnemnda for barnevern og sosiale saker – hereafter “the Board”).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0610DEC005441919
10 juin 2021
THE LAW Alleged violation of Article 8 of the Convention 21.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0515JUD003732613
15 mai 2018
By means of a letter of 29 January 2009 the Board informed the first applicant, via the latter’s legal counsel, that the original decision was reconfirmed.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0118DEC002778895
18 janvier 1996
The Board continued that if the Board's legal director was of the opinion that further representations did not disclose sufficient information to justify the matter being put before the Board again
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1012DEC002832003
12 octobre 2004
It gave the following reasoning: “The Aliens Appeals Board shares the Migration Board's assessment of the reasons that [the applicant] has invoked before the Migration Board.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0630DEC001550689
30 juin 1993
With regard to their original parcels, which in their view were possible future building plots, the Land Reform Board found that these parcels did not directly border on a built-up area.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0215DEC004655399
15 février 2000
On 10 November 1998 the Appeals Board upheld the Immigration Board's decision.
ECLI:CEDH:001-145901
1 juillet 2014
The Board did not find that he risked being imprisoned for the murders.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0521DEC003984198
21 mai 2002
The Board granted the applicants’ request to fly I. to the USA to be examined by specialists.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0515DEC002515594
15 mai 1996
to the Board and to prepare a draft decision.