The applicant was a single man, aged 28, who was in good health and able to undertake physical work.

Following the domestic courts’ dismissal of their claims, they brought a constitutional complaint.

En mars 2001, il fut finalement reconnu coupable et condamné à un an et demi d’emprisonnement.

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. 3.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Mullai and Others v.

appoint at the instance of any person who so alleges, may, without prejudice to any other action with respect to the same matter that is lawfully available, apply to the Civil Court, First Hall, for redress

Obarrio, Ciudad de Panama (République de Panama), agissant par son administrateur et représentant Mme Clairette Y..., domiciliée en cette qualité audit siège, en cassation d'une ordonnance rendue le 30 mars

  On 23 May 1992 a memorial meeting was held in Ankara for three prisoners who had been executed in May 1972. The applicant was invited by the organisation committee to speak at the meeting.

The right of access, however, is not absolute, but may be subject to limitations since the right by its very nature calls for regulation by the State.

notamment contre lui, des chefs de détournement de fonds publics et recel de ce délit, a prononcé sur l'annulation d'actes de la procédure ; La COUR, statuant après débats en l'audience publique du 16 mai

    Section 83 of the EPSA reads as follows: “(1)     A prisoner who claims to have suffered torture or other cruel forms of inhuman or degrading treatment may lodge a request for judicial

Between 4 February and 14 March 2011 the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Bosnia and Herzegovina

The young man continued behaving in an aggressive manner and actively resisting arrest, so officers used physical coercion, after which the young man was handcuffed and put into a police car ...” 30.

The applicant company was further invited to submit its claims for just satisfaction under Article 41 of the Convention (Rule 60 § 1). The Government replied on 5 May and 8 June 1999.

In Block 1 every prisoner may, in principle, use the gym for three hours a week. In other blocks prisoners may use the gym every day upon their request.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Mihailovs v.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Ibragimova v.

It is especially in respect of the latter that a relative may claim directly to be a victim of the authorities’ conduct ( see Orhan v.

The Court rejected this request on 17   May 2018. 29.

These matters deserve to be followed up. Closing down the party should not even be on the agenda. But there may be members of parliament, mayors or other people who have committed offences.