The defendants named were İbrahim Aktürk, Hakan Temel Aksel and Hüdaverdi Tunç.

He said that he had not committed the offences, as at the time of the murder he had been at his grandmother’s house in another village, and that he had confessed to the offences under duress. 18.

Türkiye 21/06/2019 Ahmet Hulusi BÜYÜKYAVUZ 1986 Konya Turkish Halil İbrahim KEBEŞOĞLU   36436/19 Yıldız v.

Norway ([GC], no. 37283/13, §§   202 ‑ 13, 10 September 2019) and have since been restated in a number of cases, including Abdi Ibrahim v.

  Türkiye 29/04/2019 Abdurrahim YAVUZ Yozgat Turkish Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ 13. 27132/19 Taşkın v.

Türkiye 16/01/2017 Talha ALTINTOP 03/01/1980 Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ Ordinary judge or public prosecutor HSYK decision 4. 43702/17 Can v.

In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the

The applicants argued that they did not know the said persons. 7.     On 23 July 2004 the Public Prosecutor heard the applicants.

B.A. had said: “This report is a real piece of treachery, and those who wrote it should have it ripped to shreds over their heads.

Consequently, he could not reasonably be said to have waived those rights on a valid basis. The applicant’s right to legal assistance had therefore been restricted.

Türkiye 14/06/2019 Mehmet ÇELİK 23/01/1969 Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ 27. 37094/19 Taşkın v. Türkiye 27/06/2019 Ahmet TAŞKIN 26/01/1965 Hüseyin AYGÜN 28. 37126/19 Aydın v.

(d)     Abduction of Mr Ibragim Askhabov 23.     Mr Ibragim Askhabov was born in 1983.

He could not explain why he had initially said that he had used a hammer, not an axe. He said that he had thought it would be better for him if he said that he had used a hammer.

xa0;           78971/11 15/09/2011 Naci ÜNAL 01/01/1969 Van Gönül ÜLGEN             1323/12 21/12/2011 İbrahim

On 24 October 1993 the Diyarbakır Governor, İbrahim Şahin, and the State of Emergency Regional Governor, Ünal Erkan, arrived in Lice.

In general, the book can be said to glorify Kaypakkaya's personality, his thinking and his work, while the authorities are being described as oppressive "reactionaries".   33.

    The applicants were represented by Mr İbrahim Ergün, a lawyer practising in Istanbul.

In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal

Une partie n’a pas le droit absolu d’exiger du tribunal qu’il expose les motifs qu’il a de rejeter chacun de ses arguments (voir İbrahim Aksoy c.

    Ibrahim Hafez Ibrahim Ed Degwej later christened Joseph Leopold invoked section   137 of the Criminal Code to challenge his prolonged and indefinite detention further to a removal order