Puy de Mur rendait celui-ci inopposable à la SCI qui avait régulièrement acquis les mêmes parcelles par acte notarié des 3 mars et 18 mai 1998 et a pu en déduire que la société Carrière Puy de Mur devait

In the case of Başbilen v.

In March and April 1969, five major explosions thought to have been caused by the UVF occurred at water and electricity installations in three counties.

      The case concerns the killing of the applicant’s parents and brother Orhan, allegedly by armed members of the Balpınar village guards, on 16 March 1993 and the investigation of these

The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.”

The landlord applied for execution of the removal order, which was approved on 7 March 2003 by the Wels District Court, and which was finally carried out on 28 February 2005.

On 19 March 2014 the Baku Court of Appeal upheld the first-instance court’s decision.

The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

The case concerned the alleged unlawfulness of a search carried out by the police of the applicants’ flat in March 2001 following a crime – six windows had been broken – committed in the neighbourhood,

    The applicant was accused and subsequently found guilty of placing a time-bomb device in a flower pot and leaving it in a street in İzmir on 31   March 2006.

    The Supreme Court ( Högsta domstolen ) later granted the re-opening of the case.

  51693/13, §§ 45 et seq., 16   March   2017)?

Published on 19 February 2024   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 47841/20 Isaura DE JESUS and Others against Portugal lodged on 27 October 2020 communicated on 2 February 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE

    The case originated in three applications (nos.

that the case be given priority.

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE SOCIALE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le premier moyen : Attendu qu'il est fait grief à l'arrêt attaqué (Aix-en-Provence, 13 mars 2004

In the case of Suptel v.

COURT’S CASE-LAW REFERRED TO 22.2.1996, Bulut v. Austria; 19.12.1997, Brualla Gómez de la Torre v. Spain   In the case of Edificaciones March Gallego S.A. v.

It referred to the complexity of the case. The delay was caused by the absence of some of the accused and their counsel at the hearings and the illness of some of the accused and the judge.