CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115DEC007525510
15 novembre 2016
Judges initially appointed shall not be eligible for reappointment.
Page 12 sur 16
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0426JUD001597490
26 avril 1995
The person making the statement shall not be punished if it is proved to be true.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1125JUD000239024
25 novembre 2025
Such symptoms should always raise concerns about that inmate’s condition, and the inmate should always be discussed by healthcare professionals.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0209JUD002578409
9 février 2017
It may be subject to editorial revision.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0216JUD002723605
16 février 2016
Where relevant, the dates of their detention are listed in Annex I. 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1023JUD002192093
23 octobre 1996
Swietek, Bulletin des arrêts de la Cour de cassation no. 93) the Court of Cassation held that the obligation to annex a copy of the decision appealed against "has to be understood as applying not only
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1127JUD006435619
27 novembre 2025
AGCOM specified that, in line with European best practice, the allocation of digital frequencies would be organised on a so-called “beauty contest” bidding model (that is, frequencies would be allocated
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD000914607
17 janvier 2012
the maximum sentence that could be imposed would be life in prison.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECGRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0409DEC003937120
9 avril 2024
France cases would be held on 29 March 2023, and a hearing in the present case would be held before the same composition of the Grand Chamber at a later stage. 8 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0523JUD001166285
23 mai 1991
The contrasting treatment of Austrian women, who are to be spared the need for abortions by being placed in a better financial position, and mothers of migrant workers’ families who are not only not to
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:1011REP001080284
11 octobre 1990
Anne Marie Schwarz, Adviser. 15.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0825JUD001028283
25 août 1987
enough for it to be noticed by the applicant.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0329JUD001111884
29 mars 1989
In any event, such statements raise doubts which need to be looked into.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0528JUD003560597
28 mai 2002
not be delegated to the independent tribunal.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0415JUD004387509
15 avril 2014
It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Asalya v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0606JUD001345915
6 juin 2024
It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of L.T. v.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0526DEC002894595
26 mai 1998
She was told that the first applicant could not be returned home but would be taken to a local hospital for further examination.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0625JUD004570920
25 juin 2024
It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Bechi v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0527JUD005178122
27 mai 2025
That should only be done in cases where it would calm the situation. The last step after a situation had settled down would be that the inmate would be handcuffed and brought to a standing position”.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0518DEC001648002
18 mai 2010
The Court finds that these submissions raise a further issue to be examined under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.