CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0506JUD000881207
6 mai 2010
Accordingly, the period goes from 16 February 1993 to 22 February 1999 and from 30 January 2001 to 9 July 2007. 32.
Page 12 sur 15
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1023REP001899091
23 octobre 1995
REFFI M.A.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:1013DEC001811691
13 octobre 1993
REFFI B.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:0828JUD000922880
28 août 1986
Affectée comme elle le souhaitait à un établissement de Dortmund, le lycée (Gymnasium) Goethe, elle y acheva sa formation le 31 juillet 1974.
civ1
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2018:C101104
21 novembre 2018
G... devant le tribunal correctionnel des chefs de présentation de comptes inexacts et de remise et confirmation d'informations mensongères, infractions qui correspondaient aux faits globalement dénoncés
CASELAW;REPORTS;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0403REP001256586
3 avril 1990
été introduite par le requérant, il ordonna en vertu de l'article 29 de la loi sur la protection de la nature la cessation des travaux et souligna qu'il allait prendre des mesures pour permettre la remise
ECLI:CEDH:001-45626
15 octobre 1993
REFFI 15.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0614JUD002049192
14 juin 2001
It held that the argument concerning the refusal to remit the case had been conclusively disposed of in its judgment of 27 June 1990.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1108JUD004348109
8 novembre 2012
The Federal Constitutional Court did not find it necessary to remit the case for re-examination to the lower courts, as there was no indication that the lower courts would come to a different
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0429JUD000904305
29 avril 2014
(f) the procedural agreement is not the result of duress, intimidation or a promise which goes beyond what is permitted in such an agreement; (g) the accused does not contest
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0325JUD000186418
25 mars 2021
France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 74, ECHR 1999-V, and Remli v. France , 23 April 1996, § 33, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-II). 24.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0625DEC000904305
25 juin 2013
If the court finds that that the submitted evidence does not substantiate the charge or that the procedural agreement has been reached in breach of Article 679-1, it will remit the case to the prosecutor
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1112JUD004727399
12 novembre 2002
Section 75(2)(a) gives the Constitutional Court a discretion not to declare a constitutional appeal inadmissible for failure to exhaust statutory remedies if the issue at stake goes significantly beyond
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-81452
6 juin 2007
This was the figure at the end of 2005 and this figure excludes the district of North Antrim (which goes up to the end of June 2005).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1128JUD002555118
28 novembre 2023
Inter alia , it found it clear that the Supreme Court’s Records Service could in practice remit the case to the panel for re-examination.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0304REP002777295
4 mars 1998
:21.08pt; display:inline-block } EUROPEAN COMMISSION OF HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST CHAMBER Application No. 27772/95 Nigel David Gooch
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0113JUD003563213
13 janvier 2015
In consequence, on 7 October 2008 the Regional Court re-examined the appeal and decided to quash the decision of 23 May 2006 and to remit the case to the first-instance court for re ‑
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0212DEC001744090
12 février 1993
REFFI Mr.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1023DEC002486594
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1023DEC006279310
23 octobre 2012
If such a decision goes against the appellant that has not denied him the essence of his right to access to the Supreme Court.