AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0825DEC003859807
25 août 2009
25 août 2009
On 30 January 2007 and 28 May 2007 the applicant company requested the Enforcement Office to take measures in order to enforce the final judgment in its favour, but received no reply.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1016DEC002730304
16 octobre 2007
16 octobre 2007
On 22 December 2003 the Râşcani District Court ruled in favour of the applicant and ordered the Ministry of Finance (“the Ministry”) to pay him 432,619 Moldovan lei (MDL) (the equivalent
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0602DEC000691408
2 juin 2009
2 juin 2009
Despite attempts by the applicant to obtain enforcement, the final judgment in her favour has not been enforced to date. COMPLAINTS 1.
Source officiellesoc
6079b2009ba5988459c54fbd
1 décembre 1971
1 décembre 1971
SUR LE MOYEN UNIQUE : ATTENDU QU'IL EST FAIT GRIEF A L'ARRET ATTAQUE D'AVOIR DIT QU'ETAIT DU A UNE FAUTE INEXCUSABLE DE LA SOCIETE DE FABRICATION D'ARTICLES DE VOYAGE ET MAROQUINERIE FAVO L'ACCIDENT DU
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0730JUD003395905
30 juillet 2009
30 juillet 2009
The applicant complained that the judgments given in her favour and in favour of her husband were not enforced in good time.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0113JUD000074605
13 janvier 2009
13 janvier 2009
Thus, the award in favour of Mrs Gurova had remained without execution for more than 7 years and 4 months.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179980
12 décembre 2017
12 décembre 2017
3713) for disseminating propaganda in favour of the PKK, an illegal armed organisation.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-247618
17 novembre 2025
17 novembre 2025
November 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the delay in enforcing the judgment of 31 October 2017 (enforcement writ issued on 11 December 2017) rendered in the applicant’s favour
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3622
10 novembre 2005
10 novembre 2005
The money due pursuant to the judgments in his favour granting him damages was transferred to his bank account in February 2003.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-234275
17 mai 2024
17 mai 2024
Relying on Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, the applicant complains about the non-enforcement of the final decision in her favour.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1113JUD003234704
13 novembre 2007
13 novembre 2007
The Bailiff also informed her that administrative proceedings had been instituted against the Minister of the Interior for non-enforcement of the final judgment in favour of the applicant. 12.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0113JUD003583505
13 janvier 2009
13 janvier 2009
The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the respondent State’s failure to enforce the final judgments rendered in their favour.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0621JUD000219103
21 juin 2007
21 juin 2007
In all cases the courts ruled in their favour (at least in part of their claims) making monetary awards. However, for some time the judgments in their favour remained unenforced. A.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1126JUD007527110
26 novembre 2013
26 novembre 2013
The applicants complained about the respondent State’s failure to fully enforce the final court decisions in their favour.
Source officielleciv2
613720d9cd580146773eeea7
8 mars 1989
8 mars 1989
contre la CPAMRP ; Sur le premier moyen : Attendu, selon l'arrêt attaqué (Douai, 27 juin 1986), qu'au cours d'une collision en chaîne sur une autoroute un camion appartenant à la société Chomette-Favor
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0918DEC000321007
18 septembre 2008
18 septembre 2008
COMPLAINT The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No.1 thereto about non-enforcement of the judgment of 13 April 2006 in his favour.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-167330
16 septembre 2016
16 septembre 2016
They stressed that they had not acted with the intention of disseminating propaganda in favour of an illegal organisation.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-205010
7 septembre 2020
7 septembre 2020
KJAMILOV against North Macedonia lodged on 17 March 2018 and 14 June 2018 respectively SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications concern the failure to enforce final and enforceable judgments in favour
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1465
25 juin 2009
25 juin 2009
A Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court subsequently examined the case in adversarial proceedings and quashed the judgment in the applicant company’s favour on one of the three statutory grounds.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13678
7 juin 2022
7 juin 2022
France (relinquishment) - 7189/21 Article 2 Positive obligations Alleged inadequacy of action to prevent global warming: relinquishment in favour of the Grand Chamber Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect
Source officiellePage 13 sur 606