CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0929DEC007680711
29 septembre 2015
Discrimination means treating differently, without an objective and reasonable justification, persons in similar situations ( Maktouf and Damjanović v.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0505JUD002499921
5 mai 2026
They also align with the guarantees that the Court has previously accepted as adequate (see, mutatis mutandis , Maktouf and Damjanović , cited above, § 51).
Pôle 1 - Chambre 2
6a0fec79cdc6046d47886763
21 mai 2026
[S] [D] [Adresse 5] [Localité 2] Représentés par Me Sonia MAKOUF, avocat au barreau de VAL-DE-MARNE COMPOSITION DE LA COUR : L'affaire a été débattue le 2 Avril 2026, en audience publique
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1031JUD001724811
31 octobre 2017
The Court requires itemised bills and invoices that are sufficiently detailed to enable it to determine to what extent the above requirements have been met (see Maktouf and Damjanović v.
CASELAW;ADVISORYOPINIONS;PROTOCOL16;OPINIONS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-6708761-8934734
29 mai 2020
The case of Maktouf and Damjanović v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC] was particularly instructive regarding the application of the method of comparison in concreto in respect of penalties.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1020DEC004333109
20 octobre 2015
domestic appeal court in cases which are factually or legally similar to the applicant’s case and where there is no likelihood of the appeal court reversing its own recent precedent (see, for instance, Maktouf
Reconduite à la frontière
DTA_2110682_20221129
29 novembre 2022
C A, demeurant 6 rue du Bac à Charenton-le-Pont (94220), représenté par Me Makouf, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler l'arrêté en date du 19 novembre 2021 par lequel le préfet de la Seine-Saint-Denis
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0922DEC003024710
22 septembre 2020
to use the domestic remedies, thus dispensing States from answering before the European Court for their acts before they have had an opportunity to put matters right through their own legal system ( Maktouf
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0903DEC001680011
3 septembre 2019
With reference to Maktouf and Damjanović v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1203JUD008472117
3 décembre 2019
applicant must have paid them, or be bound to pay them, pursuant to a legal or contractual obligation, and they must have been unavoidable in order to prevent the violation found or to obtain redress (see Maktouf
Chambre 1
DTA_2200003_20260123
23 janvier 2026
Panighel, rapporteur public ; - et les observations de Me Makhlouche, substituant Me Lantero, représentant le centre hospitalier universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0410DEC005040815
10 avril 2018
Discrimination means treating differently, without an objective and reasonable justification, persons in similar situations (see Maktouf and Damjanović v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1016JUD000495415
16 octobre 2018
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1110DEC006677213
10 novembre 2020
of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 12 to the Convention, discrimination means treating differently, without an objective and reasonable justification, persons in similar situations (see Maktouf
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0114JUD002942217
14 janvier 2020
The Court requires itemised bills and invoices that are sufficiently detailed to enable it to determine to what extent the above requirements have been met ( Maktouf and Damjanović v.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0428DEC004493812
28 avril 2020
Lettonie [GC], n o 36376/04, § 187, CEDH 2010, et Maktouf et Damjanović c. Bosnie-Herzégovine [GC], n os 312/08 et 34179/08, § 76, CEDH 2013 (extraits)).
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-112346
31 août 2010
; font-size:10pt } .s653E6C45 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } 7 September 2010 FOURTH SECTION Application no. 2312/08 by Abduladhim MAKTOUF
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0218JUD004577616
18 février 2020
Spain [GC], no. 42750/09, § 77, ECHR 2013; Maktouf and Damjanović v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 2312/08 and 34179/08, § 66, ECHR 2013 (extracts); and Vasiliauskas v. Lithuania [GC], no.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1006JUD007588213
6 octobre 2020
Cour doit rechercher si les juridictions internes ont appliqué la loi dont les dispositions étaient les plus favorables à la société requérante compte tenu des circonstances spécifiques de l’affaire ( Maktouf
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0601JUD002183810
1 juin 2017
requérant ne peut obtenir le remboursement de ses frais et dépens que dans la mesure où se trouvent établis leur réalité, leur nécessité et le caractère raisonnable de leur taux (voir, par exemple, Maktouf
Page 13 sur 15