It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Korostelev v.

The member elected by the National Assembly may not be a judge. 4. Members of the Supreme Judicial Council shall be elected for a term of five years, without the right to be re-elected. ... 8.

France judgment of 26 September 1995, para. 33, to be published in Series A no. 325).   49.

be inspected.

Article 36 § 1 “Equal protection of rights before the courts of law ... shall be guaranteed.”

investigators’ superiors be taken.

Only such a solution could be a reasonable justification of differential treatment and would be consistent with the requirements of Article 1 of Protocol No. 12 that any right set forth by law shall be

   At the hearing submissions will first be made by or on behalf of the appellant; whilst unusual, this may be done in writing (section 234 of the 1975 Act).

    Given that the domestic courts are better placed than the international judge to assess what is likely to be considered provocative and offensive by the society, and that the text on the

    As to the objective test, it must be determined whether, quite apart from the judge’s conduct, there are ascertainable facts which may raise doubts as to his or her impartiality.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Myasnik Malkhasyan v.

At the same time, it should be borne in mind that the agreements signed between the parties, which created the right of purchase-redemption, were extended ... specifically in view of the debtor’s best

An officer allegedly replied to him that he would better do so otherwise he would be “picked off”. 12.

where the case raises sensitive moral or ethical issues, this margin would be wider; there would also usually be a wide margin if the State was required to strike a balance between competing private and

Freedom of movement for workers shall be secured within the Community. 2.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Stübing v.

Any such claim would have to be made in the High Court in the first instance. The [European Convention of Human Rights Act 2003] might be relevant. 77.

However, the legislature deemed it necessary for hunting grounds to be “pooled” in some cases.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Salay v.