The Court has examined a similar situation in the case of Smirnov v.

: Par une requête enregistrée le 9 septembre 2025, le Syndicat des avocats de France, le Syndicat de la magistrature et l'association de défense des libertés constitutionnelles, représentés par Me Smira

: Par une requête enregistrée le 9 septembre 2025, le Syndicat des avocats de France, le Syndicat de la magistrature et l'association de défense des libertés constitutionnelles, représentés par Me Smira

  24205/06, §   112, 31 May 2011; and Andrey Smirnov v.   Russia , no.   43149/10, §   38, 13 February 2018). 60 .

  3708/03, § 40, 14 January 2010, with further references; Smirnov v.   Russia , no.   71362/01 , § 43, 7 June 2007; and Miailhe v.

inline-block } .s4D6B2E9B { width:184.1pt; display:inline-block } .sDEA786DA { width:210.67pt; display:inline-block } FIRST SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 71362/01 by Mikhail SMIRNOV

court in civil matters, constitutes one aspect only; however, it is an aspect that makes it possible to benefit from the further guarantees laid down in paragraph   1 of Article 6 (see Sergey Smirnov

in civil matters, constitutes one aspect only; however, it is an aspect that makes it in fact possible to benefit from the further guarantees laid down in paragraph   1 of Article 6 (see Sergey Smirnov

nos. 2653/13 and 60980/14, §§ 123-28, 4   October 2016, where extreme overcrowding inside the glass cabin led the Court to the conclusion of a violation of Article 3 of the Convention; Andrey Smirnov

    Violation de l’article 8   Violation de l’article 1 du Protocole n° 1   Violation de l’article 13 Smirnov c.

in civil matters, constitutes one aspect only; however, it is an aspect that makes it in fact possible to benefit from the further guarantees laid down in paragraph   1 of Article 6 (see Sergey Smirnov

xa0; 18078/18 05/03/2018 Konstantin Viktorovich VORONOV 28/12/1983 Vtorushin Nikolay Aleksandrovich Tyumen   12/03/2019 18/04/2019 8,100     22426/18 20/04/2018 Aleksandr Gennadyevich SMIRNOV

entreprise     5701/06 29/12/2005   Nikolay Lavrentyevich LOGINOV***   Leonid Mikhaylovich KSENOFONTOV       Mikhail Vasilyevich BEKTYARSKIKH   Mikhail Aleksandrovich SMIRNOV

raised under Article 8 § 1 of the Convention relating to restrictions on family visits in pre-trial detention facilities which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Andrey Smirnov

  Russia , no. 9348/14, § 31, 18 December 2018; and Andrey Smirnov v.   Russia , no. 43149/10, § 53, 13 February 2018). 6.

Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that it also discloses a violation of the Convention in the light of its findings in Andrey Smirnov v.

  41872/98, §§   42-43, 9 December 2004; Smirnov v.   Russia , no.   71362/01, § 44, 7 June 2007; Mancevschi v. Moldova , no.

width:145.17pt; display:inline-block } .sDC975C9 { width:189.42pt; display:inline-block }       FOURTH SECTION                 CASE OF SERGEY SMIRNOV

The most notorious sages gathered at the table – deputy governor Mikhail Klimov, the head of the town administration Sergey Smirnov and other officials.

  Aleksandr Smirnov v. Ukraine (no. 38683/06) The applicant, Aleksandr Smirnov, is a Ukrainian national who was born in 1970 and lives in Yevpatoriya (Ukraine).