43584/21* 11/08/2021 Lenar Maskhutovich KHANGARAYEV 1985 Danil Ilnurovich Nurgaleyev Kazan Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Kazan 23/01/2021 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Supreme

sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s23A41E03 { width:36pt; display:inline-block }    The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights

  Procedure     The application was lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 17   November 1993.

    Has there been an interference with the applicant’s right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions within the meaning of Article   1 of Protocol   No.

I, Miroslava Bálintová, the Agent of the Government of the Slovak Republic before the European Court of Human Rights, declare that the Government offer to pay to Beáta Janočková and Daniel Kvocera the

The applicants in Gratzinger v. the Czech Republic further rely on Articles 8 and 6 of the Convention, alleging an infringement of their right to respect for their home and of their right to a public hearing

He relied on Article 5 (right to liberty and security) §§ 3 and 5 and Article 13 (right to an effective remedy) of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Romania, (request for revision of the judgment of 7 January 2016), The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Vincent A.

:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:

font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 68337/14 Zoltán BÍRÓ against Hungary and 8 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights

vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 48484/13 Zoltán VARGYAI against Hungary and 7 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 35387/23 Attila KUTKA against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt }   SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 14268/24 Krisztián TENKE against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 37/17 László HUNYADI against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights

font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 63091/14 Katalin REITINGER against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

{ font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt }   SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 22808/24 Zoltán KARSAI against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

{ font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt }   SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 31156/24 Sándor KÁLNAI against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights