The relevant provisions of the Civil Code read as follows: Article 57 Personal rights “Any person whose personal rights are unlawfully infringed shall be entitled to bring proceedings to

He remained in hospital for an unspecified period of time and underwent intensive treatment. 22.

    On 17 February 2006 the applicant’s pre-trial detention was authorised by a judge for a period of ten days.

It accordingly prohibited him from receiving visitors for a period of three months.

About twenty-five persons took part.

It also noted that the first applicant had been detained in Moscow on 7 December 2010 as a person wanted by the Tajikistani authorities.

person’s right to private life.

considéré comme étant de bonne foi ; qu'en ce qui le concerne, il avait, à la demande d'un nommé C..., ramené en France des espèces françaises dont il ignorait le montant et qu'il remettait à une personne

[P], pour dégager sa responsabilité pénale, fait valoir que son fait personnel ne serait pas démontré ; qu'il relate lui-même dans ses écritures que lorsqu'il a été informé de l'imminence

aux conditions d'emploi dans les locaux d'un établissement sous enseigne Monoprix, exploitant un commerce de détail non spécialisé à prédominance alimentaire ; que la consultation des plannings du personnel

It observed in particular that the principle of gender equality was not intended to be applicable to the individual person, i.e. to an individual’s exercise of personal freedom.

The neighbouring piece of property, known as Salmenranta 9:39, was owned by a person named T.

Protection of personal data Article 42 “The protection of personal data shall be guaranteed. Collecting, keeping, processing and using personal data shall be regulated by law.

The applicant’s offence was punishable with two to eight years’ imprisonment.

there are facts to suggest that a person, trace or object is to be found in the premises searched.

The inability to plead justification was a measure that went beyond what was required to protect a person’s reputation and rights, even when that person was a head of State or government”.

human dignity (offences punishable under Articles 225-14 and 225-15 of the Criminal Code).

In the course of 1995, it appeared that the applicant drew money from the Privatisation Agency banks’ accounts for his personal needs.

control where there is no longer a danger that the accused person may abscond or commit an offence.”

et à l’effet d’éliminer ou d’atténuer le danger de voir le délinquant commettre d’autres actes punissables, le juge pourra ordonner le renvoi dans un hôpital ou un hospice.