procédure principale ni dans celui de la procédure Pinto les juridictions internes n’ont estimé que les demandes des requérants pouvaient être considérées comme abusives (voir, mutatis mutandis , Jovanović

Jovanović, its President; the decision to give notice of the complaints concerning the substantive and procedural aspects of Article   3 of the Convention to the Serbian Government (“the Government

available to the applicant, the period runs from the date of the acts or measures complained of, or from the date of knowledge of that act or its effect on or prejudice to the applicant (see Zorica Jovanović

inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } FIFTH SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 36117/04 by Dimče JOVANOV

Vasilka CVETANOVSKA 1964   Lepa NAJDOVSKA 1955   Bozidar PANCHEVSKI 1953   Violetka SHISHKOVA 1949   Mara VANGELOVA 1961 21/07/2023   14/06/2023   300 250   Todor JOVANOV

avoid } .s1C8B5CE1 { width:147.94pt; display:inline-block } .s40964402 { width:201.63pt; display:inline-block }     SECOND SECTION             CASE OF ZORICA JOVANOVIĆ

The three applications concern women who suspect that their newborn children, born between 1986 and 1994, were abducted in State-run hospitals and unlawfully given up for adoption (compare Zorica Jovanović

In the case of Paun Jovanović v.

Čačak   22/02/2005 [9]   10749/13 15/01/2013 Vlastimir JOVANOVIĆ 11/11/1950 Serbian   1. Čačak   28/01/ 2000; 28/01/2000 2. Čačak   08/03/2007; 29/05/ 2007 1.

Slovénie (n°26828/06) Les onze requérants sont Mustafa Kurić, Ljubomir Petreš, Velimir Dabetić et Ilfan Sadik Ademi, apatrides, Milan Makuc (décédé) et Ana Mezga, ressortissants croates, Jovan Jovanović

18650/09 ) Les requérants, Miodrag Tomić, Čedomir Čabarkapa, Aleksandar Đukanović, Miraš Furtula, Dragica Piper, Srđan Piper, Mirela Piper, Nenad Zindović, Zoran Ulićević, Dragoljub Milačić, Vaso Jovanović

  69580/01, 18 April 2002; Jovanović v.   Croatia (dec.), no. 59109/00, 28   February 2002).

afférents à l'édition de certaines oeuvres d'[B] [S] (...) accumulés entre les mains de la maison d'édition Reynal & Hitchcock au droit de qui se trouve aujourd'hui la maison d'édition Harcourt Brace Jovanovitch

complaint raised by the applicant under Article 6 of the Convention is closely linked to her complaint under Article 8 and may accordingly be examined as part of the latter complaint (see, for example, Jovanovic

ET LES FIRMES DU GROUPE JOUANOVICI A MARSEILLE, ET EN TANT QU'ELLE AVAIT RETENU SA COMPETENCE POUR CONNAITRE DES INFRACTIONS REPROCHEES SUR CE POINT AU DEMANDEUR, DECISION QUI AVAIT ETE MOTIVEE PAR LE

events which gave rise to these proceedings would amount to giving retroactive effect to the Convention which would be contrary to general principles of international law (see, as a recent authority, Jovanović

#xa0;    16890/08 Mr Radivoje Kostadinović   1947 Loznica, Serbia                   16892/08 Mr Krsto Jovanović

Court in Kraljevo I.1306/05 of 14/10/2005 I.194/08 of 24/01/2008                    47005/08 22/09/2008 Slavica JOVANOVIĆ

    Following several unsuccessful auctions the debtor was finally sold on 12 January 2007 to Jovanović company from Šabac. 17.