In a letter of 27 October 2010 the applicants objected against the Government’s declaration by referring to various aspects of the friendly settlement negotiations. 23.

    In a letter of 27 October 2010 the applicants objected against the Government’s declaration by referring to various aspects of the friendly settlement negotiations.

On 20 May 2009 a letter was received from the Government stating that direct negotiations with the applicant had resulted in a friendly settlement of the case.

Despite negotiations for a peaceful solution under the auspices of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) and the Minsk Group, no political settlement of the conflict has been

Despite negotiations for a peaceful solution under the auspices of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) and the Minsk Group, no political settlement of the conflict has been

After negotiations with the cyclist’s insurers had failed, the applicant applied to the German courts on 18 September 1989, in particular seeking damages and payment of a monthly pension.

The authorities’ decision to give priority to an approach based on cooperation and negotiation was not called into question, especially as Article   7 of the Hague Convention stressed the need to

Article 37 § 1 (c): The Court proceeded on the basis of the Government’s unilateral declaration and the parties’ observations submitted outwith the framework of confidential friendly settlement negotiations

Nepost, greffier d'audience : - le rapport de M. C ; - les observations de Me Teffo, représentant M. A, qui a repris ses écritures ; - et les observations de M.

Nepost, greffier d'audience : - le rapport de M. C , - et les observations de Me Teffo, représentant M. B, qui a repris ses écritures. Considérant ce qui suit : 1. M.

Nepost, greffier d'audience : - le rapport de M. E ; - et les observations de Me Arrom, représentant M. A, qui a repris ses écritures. Considérant ce qui suit : 1. M.

According to the applicants, during these negotiations they also requested the payment of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages emanating from the delayed enforcement of the judgment debt, but in vain. 8

above, in particular with respect to any such payments by the debtor after the notification issued by the competent bailiff and submitted by the applicants in the process of friendly settlement negotiations

COMPOSITION DU TRIBUNAL lors des débats et du délibéré : Président : Aude MORALES Assesseurs : Corinne JANACKOVIC Sophie BEN HAMIDA assisté de Maximilien RIBES, greffier, lors des débats et de Marjorie NEBOUT

COMPOSITION DU TRIBUNAL lors des débats et du délibéré : Président : Aude MORALES Juges : Corinne JANACKOVIC Sophie BEN HAMIDA assistés de Maximilien RIBES, greffier, lors des débats et de Marjorie NEBOUT

COMPOSITION DU TRIBUNAL lors des débats et du délibéré : Président : Aude MORALES Assesseurs : Sophie BEN HAMIDA Corinne JANACKOVIC assisté de Maximilien RIBES, greffier, lors des débats et de Marjorie NEBOUT

COMPOSITION DU TRIBUNAL lors des débats et du délibéré : Président : Aude MORALES Juges : Corinne JANACKOVIC Sophie BEN HAMIDA assisté de Maximilien RIBES, greffier, lors des débats, et de Marjorie NEBOUT

COMPOSITION DU TRIBUNAL lors des débats et du délibéré : Karine ESPOSITO Juge délégué par ordonnance de Madame la Présidente du Tribunal, assisté de Françoise CHAZAL, greffier lors des débats et deMarjorie NEBOUT

The main negotiations were carried out by investment banks and law firms.

However, such negotiations never materialised and the conditional moratorium was denounced by the Supreme Council on 28 December 1990 (paragraph 70 below).