of the measure to which it was liable, an adequate opportunity to put its case to the responsible authorities, pleading, as the case might be, illegality or arbitrary and unreasonable conduct (see Yildirim

Zübeyde YILDIRIM 1957 turque Ankara  

inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } SECOND SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 25327/02 by Nesrin YILDIRIM

Italie (déc.), n o   52439/99, 4 septembre 2001, et Yildirim   c.   Italie (déc.), n o 38602/02, 10 avril 2003).

  316 ‑ A, and Yildirim v. Italy ((dec.), no. 38602/02, 10 April 2003).

    The Government underlined the similarities between the applicant’s case and the case of Yildirim v. Austria ((dec.), no. 34308/96, 19 October 1999).

Russie (n o 74826/01, § 31, 24 novembre 2005), Yildirim c. Autriche ((déc.), n o 34308/96, 19 octobre 1999), Tavlı c. Turquie (n o 11449/02, §   26, 9 novembre 2006) ou Uçar c.

Türkiye 19/04/2022 Nazmi TAYBOĞA 1973 İzmir Turkish Abdulmecit YILDIRIM 10,000 2,000 7,805 Legal services agreement indicating EUR 920 500 8. 22338/22 Taş v.

s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .s3133A7C8 { font-family:Arial; color:#0069d6 }       SECOND SECTION               CASE OF YILDIRIM

2009 Cemile KAYA 28/02/1957 Tunceli Akın KAYA 10/03/1981 Tunceli   İbrahim KAYA 10/11/1982 Tunceli   Cemal KAYA 05/11/1986 Tunceli     Deniz KAYA 15/02/1975 Elazığ   Barış YILDIRIM

tenu de ce qui précède, ainsi que de l’ampleur de la marge d’appréciation dont disposait l’État défendeur, en particulier dans le cadre d’une politique visant à combattre des phénomènes criminels ( Yildirim

inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } THIRD SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 33396/02 by Halil YILDIRIM

représentant légal dont le siège social est sis [Adresse 2] non représentée COMPOSITION DU TRIBUNAL: Présidente : Françoise ROSENAU Assesseur : Sébastien DORKEL, Juge-Consulaire Assesseur : Mésut YILDIRIM

measure to which he was liable, an adequate opportunity to put his case to the responsible authorities, pleading, as the case might be, illegality or arbitrary and   unreasonable conduct (see Yildirim

06/2017 40303/98 GÜMÜŞ AND OTHERS 15/03/2005 15/06/2005 35071/97 GÜNDÜZ MÜSLÜM 04/12/2003 14/06/2004 65849/01 GÜZEL No. 2 27/07/2006 27/10/2006 30007/96 HALIS 11/01/2004 11/04/2005 42920/98 HAYDAR YILDIRIM

Turquie (déc.) n o 31865/96, 28 mai 2002, Bayram et Yildirim c. Turquie (déc.), n o 38587/97, 29 janvier 2002, et Güneş c.   Turquie (déc.) n o 28490/95, 9 octobre 2001).

. ***** Monsieur Murat Y... et Madame Nilgun X... se sont mariés le 30 avril 1992 à YILDIHM (Turquie).

importance of the aim pursued, and on the other the burden imposed on the applicant, including the nature of the interference, the behaviour of the applicant, and that of the State authorities (see Yildirim

Türkiye 19/06/2020 Yavuz KILIÇ 1984 Aydın Turkish Ömer Faruk YILDIRIM 69. 26804/20 Karabacak v. Türkiye 09/06/2020 Ensar KARABACAK 1966 Balıkesir Turkish Burcu HAS 70. 26836/20 Güngör v.

Türkiye 04/06/2021 Hakim YILDIRIM 1988 Turkish Ayşe KAYA   35342/21 Aydın v. Türkiye 04/06/2021 Harun AYDIN 1987 Hatay Turkish Adem KAPLAN   35446/21 Sebahattin v.