CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0122JUD003706922
22 janvier 2026
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10 of the Convention 7.
Page 16 sur 851
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0123DEC001619922
23 janvier 2025
They further requested the Court to strike out the applications in accordance with Article 37 of the Convention.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1218JUD001354503
18 décembre 2007
SUR LA VIOLATION ALLÉGUÉE DE L'ARTICLE 6 § 1 DE LA CONVENTION 25.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0406DEC004134018
6 avril 2023
The applicants’ various complaints under Article 5 of the Convention were communicated to the Turkish Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits.
PCP JCP référé
67081b1489f19e8c50f8d428
8 octobre 2024
Dit que les frais de l'instance éteinte seront supportés par la demanderesse, sauf convention contraire des parties.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1024JUD001356802
24 octobre 2006
SUR LA VIOLATION ALLÉGUÉE DE L’ARTICLE 6 § 1 DE LA CONVENTION 30.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-117834
9 décembre 2009
la Convention européenne des droits de l'homme ainsi que par l'article 41 de la loi sur la presse.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1122DEC000975610
22 novembre 2016
10 de la Convention, par l’éditeur qui a publié le reportage litigieux ou, sous l’angle de l’article 8 de la Convention, par la personne faisant l’objet de ce reportage.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1205DEC004372721
5 décembre 2024
PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:003-2240259-2392172
18 janvier 2008
Tous les requérants invoquent l’article 5 § 3 (droit à la liberté et à la sûreté) de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme ; M.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-657505-663473
28 novembre 2002
Il invoquait l’article 8 de la Convention (droit au respect de la correspondance) de la Convention européenne des Droits de l’Homme.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-235247
24 juin 2024
Referring to Article 6 of the Convention, the applicants essentially complain that the rejection of their claims for costs and expenses, as well as the “flagrantly divergent case-law of the domestic courts
ECLI:CEDH:001-173886
4 mai 2017
21986/93, ECHR 2000 ‑ VII), was the investigation in the present case by the domestic authorities in breach of Article 2 of the Convention? 2.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0622DEC002800295
22 juin 1999
He invokes in this regard Article 6 of the Convention. 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0703DEC001368403
3 juillet 2012
taken alone or in conjunction with Article 14 of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0914DEC006429017
14 septembre 2023
In view of the above, the Court finds that these complaints do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Article 35 §§ 1 and 3 (a) and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0122JUD000796318
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 of the Convention 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1219DEC000241521
19 décembre 2024
ECLI:CEDH:001-230461
11 janvier 2024
was based, Art. 10 (1) - various restrictions on the right to freedom of expression - in respect of the second applicant Mr Slyusarev - arrest, conviction under article 19.3 § 1 of
ECLI:CEDH:001-233486
4 avril 2024
At the same time, various other documents and reports regarding her relative’s conviction, as well as the confiscation of his property, were in fact provided or obtained in the course of the rehabilitation