The domestic authorities had held that there was an evident inconsistency between what the appellants had been told by the radio’s employees and what they had reported in the letter.

The applicant had not specified in what particular manner the invoked restrictions had interfered with his opportunity to defend himself.

I defend a very serious case; I felt that I was interrupted in my cross-examination and said what I said.

If not, what were the reasons for that?

If so, what was the justification for the alleged delay in forwarding that letter to the correctional colony?

establish when the fire brigade sent to the site of the incident actually responded to the fire, whether they were held back by any technical problems encountered with their equipment and, if so, to what

What was the furnishing of the metal cage in the courtroom? Was the applicant provided with a desk like other parties to the proceedings?

In particular:   (a)     To what extent was the national security evidence open?

  (b)     Were the lawyers retained by the applicant notified of the appeal hearing and what were the reasons for their non-attendance?

  In this context, to what extent did the applicant’s statements enjoy protection by her right to defend herself against the dismissal?

In particular: (a)     What was the legal basis authorising “Rostelecom” to perform underground installation of the optic fibre cable at the applicant’s plot of land (see, mutatis mutandis ,

In particular: (a)     What safeguards did the domestic authorities put in place to counterbalance the applicants’ alleged inability to participate to the appointment of the experts and performance

The assessment of that threshold was by its very nature relative and depended on the circumstances of the case, regard being had both to the applicant’s subjective perception and to what was objectively

What steps has the applicant taken after the end of the custody proceedings in order to have contact with her daughter?

The Court had to work together with the Council of Europe and national authorities on improving the information available to the public with a view to getting across to them a clearer message about what

If so, what is the country of destination?   2.     Has the applicant exhausted all effective domestic remedies, as required by Article 35 § 1 of the Convention?   3.

    Are the applicants enabled to go outside and get fresh air and, if so, with what frequency and for how long? 2b.

Reaffirming its approach in the case of Varnava and Others ,* the Court noted that, in disappearance cases more than in cases concerning killings, it was difficult for the relatives of the missing to assess what