Ces réclamations ont fait l'objet d'une décision de rejet du 21 août 2019. M.

proceedings, did not ultimately play a decisive role in the determination of the criminal charge against the applicant (decision 3 December 2002).

présente au contraire le caractère d'une surface de stockage ; les rappels de taxe sur les surfaces commerciales mis à la charge du locataire de ce bâtiment ont d'ailleurs été abandonnés au stade de l'interlocution

  In this respect, in its decision of 6 November 2012, rendered in the case Ceuta v.

  In this respect, in its decision of 6 November 2012, rendered in the case Ceuta v.

The applicant lodged an interlocutory appeal. She submitted that the tenants’ financial situation had improved since the final decision of 14   December 2009.

The applicant lodged an interlocutory appeal. On 15 September 2011 the Rzeszów Court of Appeal ( Sąd Apelacyjny ) quashed the decision of 18 August 2011 and remitted the case.

Further, they point out that the applicant failed to appeal to the Court of Appeal from the decision of the County Court refusing an interlocutory injunction and that it does not appear that she exhaustively

.) - 58751/00 Decision 11.12.2003 [Section I] Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Civil rights and obligations Procedure for challenging a judge: Article 6 inapplicable The applicants were parties

MEME IMPLICITE SUR LES POINTS EN LITIGE ; DE PLUS, BIEN QUE CETTE AUTORITE NE SOIT CONFEREE QU'AU DISPOSITIF DES DECISIONS JUDICIAIRES, ELLE S'ETEND CEPENDANT AUX MOTIFS QUI EN SONT LE SOUTIEN ET QUI

          This judgment of the House of Lords terminated the interlocutory proceedings in the UK.

On 9 January 2004 the applicant filed an interlocutory appeal against the decision of the Warsaw Court of Appeal of 23 July 2003.

The applicants objected to the exhumation of their husbands’ bodies and lodged interlocutory appeals against the prosecutor’s decision.

appeal against the judge’s decision.

The applicant and the other suspects denied the charges and challenged the decision by way of an interlocutory appeal ( sťažnosť ). 8.

The applicants appealed the decision, and also sought a (very lengthy) extension of time to appeal the interlocutory orders made by the High Court in 1996 and 1997.

          This judgment of the House of Lords terminated the interlocutory proceedings in the UK.

    The applicant challenged the decision of 9 March 2011 by an   interlocutory appeal to the public prosecution service (“PPS”) and asked twice that a decision by the PPS to dismiss that

    On 8 January 2007 the applicant lodged an interlocutory appeal against the decision to admit him to hospital.