CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
3e chambre civile
6438f2dca942a604f5e93653
13 avril 2023
nationalité Française [Adresse 4] [Localité 1] et Madame [W] [Y] épouse [K] née le 07 Mars 1944 à [Localité 10] de nationalité Française [Adresse 4] [Localité 1] Représentée par Me Marieta TODOROVA
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-127459
26 septembre 2013
  In its judgment Paraskeva Todorova v.
1ère chambre civile B
6970b766cdc6046d471a31a1
20 janvier 2026
* * * * EXPOSÉ DU LITIGE La société civile immobilière Hillel Ethan (la SCI), qui avait pour associés MM.
6ème chambre 1ère section
67f0243202fc178212f7e443
1 avril 2025
Sur les incidents : Par conclusions d’incident distinctes notifiées par voie électronique le 06 octobre 2022, etdans ses dernières conclusions sur incident notifiées le 05 février 2025, la SCCV [Localité
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0113JUD003393206
13 janvier 2009
En l’affaire Todorova c.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0510DEC004026504
10 mai 2012
inline-block } .s8EFC8F8 { width:32.36pt; display:inline-block } .s5A070004 { width:213.96pt; display:inline-block }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 40265/04 Todor Kerezov GEORGIEV and Hriska Todorova
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1022DEC004110707
22 octobre 2013
conjunction with a criminal-law one, enabling any responsibility of the individuals concerned to be established and any appropriate civil redress, such as an order for damages, to be obtained (see Anna Todorova
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1971297-2073394
12 avril 2007
    Principal facts   The applicant, Kalinka Todorova Ivanova, is a Bulgarian national who was born in 1950 and lives in Ruse (Bulgaria).
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0830DEC003332217
30 août 2022
example of domestic practice to show that a civil court is formally bound by the findings that the prosecuting authorities make when deciding not to pursue a matter in the criminal courts (see Anna Todorova
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0131JUD003923217
31 janvier 2023
of Bulgaria lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 23 May 2017 by a Bulgarian national, Ms Albena Todorova
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0519JUD004202798
19 mai 2004
On 3 October 2003 her daughter, Ms Svetla Todorova Martinova, expressed the wish to continue the proceedings before the Court on the applicant’s behalf. 8.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1113JUD008090912
13 novembre 2014
, the above obligation calls for an effective independent judicial system to ensure enforcement of the aforementioned legislative framework by providing appropriate redress (see, for example, Anna Todorova
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-141618
3 février 2014
  19223/04, §§ 44-50, 30 July 2009; Toporkov v. Russia , no.   66688/01, §§   28-35, 1 October 2009; and Lopata v. Russia , no. 72250/01, § 107, 13   July 2010)?   2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0212JUD005675300
12 février 2009
appropriate to fix a lump sum in respect of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage with reference to the value of the property taken away from the applicants and all other relevant circumstances (see Todorova
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0203JUD003262606
3 février 2011
appropriate to fix a lump sum in respect of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage with reference to the value of the property taken away from the first applicant and all other relevant circumstances (see Todorova
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0115JUD005717600
15 janvier 2009
violation found the Court finds appropriate to fix a lump sum in respect of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage with reference to the value of the apartment and all other relevant circumstances (see Todorova
ECLI:CEDH:003-3046556-3365241
4 mars 2010
protection of property) and Violation of Article 6 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time) of the European Convention on Human Rights   Principal facts   The applicant, Galina Todorova
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0926DEC007302513
26 septembre 2017
While its case-law does not exclude the provision of a criminal-law remedy in the context of road traffic accidents (compare, Anna Todorova v.
JCP
67f834abcf40727a00447896
9 avril 2025
Localité 10] (YVELINES) [Adresse 8] [Localité 5] représentée par Me Sébastien NEANT, avocat au barreau de MONTPELLIER DEFENDERESSE: Mme [G] [E] [Adresse 7] [Localité 4] représentée par Me Marieta TODOROVA
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0825DEC003096512
25 août 2020
Convention did not necessarily require a criminal-law remedy on the facts and could be satisfied if the applicants had at their disposal an effective civil-law remedy (see, mutatis mutandis , Anna Todorova
Page 18 sur 26